21)
Forums :
Technical Support :
Not sending results automatically
(Message 3792)
Posted 2 Nov 2007 by ![]() Post: Crunch3r's BOINC Client has "Return Results Immediately" switched on (also CPU Affinity...). It's 5.9.x Maybe try that one. |
22)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3747)
Posted 31 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Hmm... Ready to send droped from 26k to 24k - they must be going somewhere... |
23)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3725)
Posted 31 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Same over here - on all platforms. Now and then a WU comes through - but not as much as needed. |
24)
Forums :
General Topics :
combined stats?
(Message 3707)
Posted 30 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: oops Hmm... I think I didn't get it... |
25)
Forums :
Technical Support :
CAMB 2.02 looses contact with BOINC-Core-Client
(Message 3704)
Posted 30 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Same with 5.8.17 Linux64. Looks funny when it says "suspended - time of day" but the counter keeps on runnin'. At least it only finishes tasks and doesn't start new ones... |
26)
Forums :
General Topics :
combined stats?
(Message 3703)
Posted 30 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Just happened to me too... [BAT]tutta55 is quite right, but attaching only one host to the first ever project does not work for everyone - I had to attach all hosts to S@H (my first project) to even the CPID out. Now I keep S@H at 0.1% as a backup project on every host. Only if I put in a new host there is little CPID hickup (mostly with RS and C@H) but this evens out after the first couple of updates. |
27)
Forums :
Technical Support :
Is the validator running?
(Message 3522)
Posted 26 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: I think someone should merge the threads... Similar problems here. |
28)
Forums :
Technical Support :
weird validation
(Message 3510)
Posted 25 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Some strage ones from my side: 631927 631638 No errors - but no credit - at least not for me... :( |
29)
Forums :
Technical Support :
IMPORTANT - Testing for Stand-Alone CAMB Application Soon
(Message 3364)
Posted 23 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Good news! Due to the importance this sould be on the front-page!!! BTW If the result isn't back by 5 PM CST tomorrow this means 23.10. 12.00PM UTC - right? |
30)
Forums :
Announcements :
New Website Design, Part Deux
(Message 3345)
Posted 22 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: There is problem with the Account Creation Page: Notice: Undefined index: changewidth in /home/skruger2/projects/cosmohome/html/inc/util.inc on line 138 Notice: Undefined index: PHP_HERE in /home/skruger2/projects/cosmohome/html/project/project.inc on line 25 Must be the page-width cookie thing... |
31)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3327)
Posted 19 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Yes, I'm aware of the problems created by using HR, but we have no choice at this project, really. LOL - "fairly beefy" - what's that in numbers? |
32)
Forums :
Technical Support :
Errors
(Message 3300)
Posted 17 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: I had 15 out of 600 stopping due to parameter error the last days. Mainly on 64bit Linux, only 2 or 3 on win and Linux32... |
33)
Forums :
General Topics :
Longer Work Units
(Message 3297)
Posted 17 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Runtime increase has been 30-50& for my farm. Seconded. The slower the rig, the bigger the increase. Strange... |
34)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3267)
Posted 16 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Well, everything fine again... Scott, what happened? Just curious... |
35)
Forums :
Technical Support :
Reboot when BOINC switches to C@H
(Message 3266)
Posted 16 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: You should also do all the Windows updates after SP2 just to make sure. You never know with Windows... |
36)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3240)
Posted 14 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: It seems to have cleared itself, or it was cleared by someone as I just got work. Nope, doesn't seem so. Except some bits and pieces now and then - no work sent. Not enough to keep them rigs runnin'. Time for the backup-projects! |
37)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3232)
Posted 14 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: Make that ALL my boxen. Same with all my boxes now. The "all green" on the server status page might still be right - it just doesn't reflect that the scheduler thinks there is nothing to send out... |
38)
Forums :
Technical Support :
there was work but it was committed to other platforms
(Message 3225)
Posted 14 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: i get this message and cant get work for 2 amd64 running xp. someone else ? yep, 3 machines already ran dry. One Xeon/Linux, one P4/Linux and the X5355/Linux. On the Athlon64/Linux the WUs are coming in again after 6 hours of 'there was work...' [edit]hmmm, just 2 WUs - no work for the Athlon again...[/edit] |
39)
Forums :
General Topics :
uptimes
(Message 3144)
Posted 7 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post:
Well, for ubuntu LTS it's over 3 months, for the 7.04 it's 1 to 1.5 months. My CentOS is server is running 4 months now, cause I skipped one kernel-upd. |
40)
Forums :
General Topics :
uptimes
(Message 3131)
Posted 6 Oct 2007 by ![]() Post: The uptime of my Linux rigs is only limited to the availability of kernel updates. :) Those are mostly servers - the XP-boxes are workstations and get a kick at least every week due to some (not boinc or OS related) app hangs... [edit] My record for win is 115 days - a w2k server with 5 users. Completely forgot the poor little thing and didn't do any updates, so a didn't have to restart... :) [/edit] |
Previous 20 · Next 20