1) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Mass density of a Black Hole Singularity, first numbers (Message 13504)
Posted 21 Oct 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Made edits blah...

Dark Matter in the Singulosynthesis Universe

The Current Scientific Consensus Composition of the Universe

4.9% - ordinary matter
26.8% - dark matter
68.3% - dark energy

(Note: Totals are from Wikipedia and cross referenced with a few other sources. I am not sure how black holes fit into these totals.)

The Singulosynthesis Universe Current Composition and Beginnings
15.5% - ordinary matter (mass with entropy and physical information)
84.5% - dark matter (Singulosynthesis remnant of timeless degeneracy mass or what I refer to as a "Ted")
0% - dark energy - Is a perceived effect of Singulosynthesis converting temporal mass into magnetized volumes of space.

(Note: These totals may need adjusting due to how black holes are classified by the current scientific consensus; black holes may require their own category.)

What could dark matter be? What could perceived dark energy be? What is a black hole? How can we find some answers? First some distinctions need to be made. I am going to describe a cosmology completely outside the context of the big bang that actually makes some sense. While Singulosynthesis should ultimately be simulated there are some ideas that can be inferred just considering it. If you have no clue what I am referring to, please refer to my other paper "The path to understanding the rational universe - An argument for the objective observation, recording, and quantification of gravitational waves based on implied consequences of conserving physical information in the entropy of a black hole horizon" if you have no idea what I am referring to or the black hole model I am using.

A black hole in the Singulosynthesis model of the universe is a temporally neutral state of mass with a temporal horizon which is governed by some rules. From the temporal side of a black hole horizon there is a physical information and entropy boundary at the gravitational radius (Schwarzschild radius). Once a black hole’s entropy and physical information boundary fills up there is an overflow mechanism (likely based on the Bekenstein bound) at the Planck length scale (this ideally should be simulated to pin down the three way process). The non-temporal side of a black hole horizon (inside the gravitational radius) ignores physical information and entropy that exists on the temporal side on the gravitational radius. In that sense, a black hole horizon is a temporal filter for mass. The temporal radius will accept mass regardless of what is going on outside the gravitational radius, so long as a gravitational horizon exists from the temporal side.

From the temporal side (outside the gravitational radius of the perceived temporal horizon) there is an entropy and physical information horizon which determines how duality is stripped from mass, how physical information and entropy are stored at the Planck scale, how physical information and entropy are reassigned during an overflow state, and how duality is reassigned back into duality by the Singulosynthesis process mechanism [The Singulosynthesis process will reassign existing horizon physical information and entropy by establishing or re-establishing duality to non-temporal mass during the Singulosynthesis process (ideally must to be simulated]. Relativistic jets are an over flow mechanism which offload the difference between what a black hole horizon can and cannot handle in terms of physical information and entropy volume.

Once Singulosynthesis is finished, and the reassigning of physical information and entropy at the temporal side gravitational radius is done, a temporal horizon will remain over the remaining non-temporal mass (what we perceive temporally as dark matter on a galactic scale). A temporal neutral black hole gravitational radius will always accept temporal mass or reassign non temporal mass through Singulosynthesis, a non-temporal mass with no entropy or physical information horizon remaining will no longer accept mass, for it is no longer a black hole which is a temporally neutral state of mass. It is this conversion of temporal mass into non-temporal mass that we perceive as the force of magnetism in a volume of space. Here is how I am calculating it as of now.

Applying the percentage of perceived dark energy 68.3% to the true existing dark matter which is 84.5%, you get a total of 57.7135% of the total currently perceived 84.5% dark matter has actually been produced through Singulosynthesis since the initial event of Singulosynthesis at the beginning of the universe. Increased magnetized volumes of space have been produced through Singulosynthesis and galaxies are progressive buildups of magnetized space volumes. If the universe is comprised of 57.7135% more dark matter and no dark energy, where is this extra dark matter or magnetized space hiding? It is hiding inside of every star.

The Singulosynthesis universe began with 26.7865% dark matter, 73.2135% matter, and 0% dark energy. This accounts for the 46.427% metallicity discrepancy we observe based on current models. Since this is how I argue the universe began and the process deterministically repeats itself, out of any black hole's 100% mass, the Singulosynthesis process should always end leaving at minimum a 26.7865% non-temporal degeneracy mass remnant of a formerly temporal neutral black hole which is actually a magnetized volume of magnetized space. Binary black holes must maintain the relativistic binary orbital velocity of the speed of light to perform Singulosynthesis. While the process of Singulosynthesis should be ideally simulated in order to be fully understood, there are some things we can infer for the existence of this process I am arguing for. Singulosynthesis occurs at the metallicity rate we observe in the universe overtime through the reassignment of entropy and physical information through Singulosynthesis and is responsible for the expansion of the universe through the conversion of temporal mass into magnetized space volumes.

According to big bang cosmology, the first generation stars in the universe formed without any magnetism at all. How can you form a hydrostatic equilibrium of plasma (what we call a star) without any magnetism to begin with? You can’t, and it is impossible despite all the cool graphics you see in TV programs. Population 3 stars are impossible entities under any version of big bang cosmology and yet the first stars had to come from somewhere right? The Singulosynthesis universe begins comprised of a 26.2135 percent volume of magnetized space (perceived as dark matter). Dark matter halos of all galaxies are weakly magnetized volumes of space from the beginning of our universe which is the CMBR, nothing exists in the Singulosynthesis universe before that point. This means at minimum 26.7865% percent of all stars are formed around magnetized volume of space which is non-temporal mass.

All stars must form around a magnetized volume of space which becomes compacted into a stars internal magnetic core dynamo, and that would include our own Sun. How can we attempt to calculate what the magnetized volume of space compacted within our (non-temporal mass quantity) own Sun should be?
Apply perceived percentage of dark energy to the true existing quantity of dark matter (which is actually a magnetized volume of space):

84.5 x .683 = 57.7135 % is to total magnetized volume of space produced through Singulosynthesis

Subtract Singulosynthesis produced magnetized volume of space from currently perceived magnetized volume of space (currently called dark matter):

84.5 - 57.7135 = 26.7865% magnetized volume of space at the beginning of Singulosynthesis Universe

The Singulosynthesis Universe Composition Beginnings

26.7865% magnetized volume of space(Singulosynthesis will always end with a magnetized volume of space and this is the best number I have right now, thanks to the Planck Satellite data)
73.2135% matter
0% dark energy.

Our Suns magnetized core is made up of a compacted magnetized volume of space created during its formation. It is a non-fusible magnetic mass which not only assisted in formation, it adds to maintaining the hydrostatic equilibrium of the star. (Temporally neutral state of final degeneracy mass density at infinite gravity = black hole singularity (Rambo), is also the minimum volume of space (non-temporal mass) necessary for mass to become temporally neutral again = Dark Matter

1 solar mass x .267865 = .267865 solar mass non fusible magnetized volume of space: 53266 X10^30 kg

Our Suns has .732135 solar mass fusible mass: 1.45589 X 10^30 kg

A temporal Gravitational radius is a neutral non-temporal mass radius as well (magnetized volume of space):

2GM/c^2 = Rs (Schwarzschild Radius)

(2 (6.67384e-11) (.53266 X10^30 kg)) / 299,792,458^2 = 791.069180m

7.10977523e19 / 299,792,458^2 = 791.069180m

Calculating minimum final degeneracy for temporal neutral mass density at perceived infinite gravity (Temporally neutral state of final degeneracy mass density = black hole singularity (I call it a Rambo) is also the minimum volume of space (non-temporal mass) necessary for mass to become temporally neutral again = Dark Matter

Volume of a Sphere= 4/3 Pi R^3

Volume of a Sphere = 4/3 Pi 495043536.1919463m

Volume of a Sphere = Pi 6.60058048e^8 m^3

Volume of a Sphere = 2.07363351e^9 m^3

Density = M/V

D = .53266e^30kg/2.07363351e^9 m^3

D = 2.56872778e^20 kg m^3

You need to start from somewhere... That is my mass density calculation for a magnetized volume of space to become temporally neutral (dark matter or as I call a magnetized Ted). It is also the mass density calculation for what is now called the black hole "Singularity" which is actually a temporally neutral state of mass. Regarding space, non-temporal mass abides by some different rules. A magnetized volume of space is a mass existing outside of our temporal horizon.

Once Singulosynthesis is finished and only a temporal horizon remains over the once temporally neutral mass, if a temporally neutral black hole horizon is governed by 2GM/C^2 law, the horizon of non-temporal mass should be larger because it is at infinite gravity, infinite gravity does not abide by the inverse square law and therefore displaces more space 2GM/C. This is how temporally neutral mass is transferred into non temporal mass in the form of magnetism within a volume of space time when Singulosynthesis ends.

Calculating a Temporal Horizon area of a non-temporal final degeneracy mass at infinite temporal gravity (magnetized volume of space)
(nt) = non temporal

The inverse square law does not apply since it is Non Temporal horizon
2GM/c = R(nt)

2GM/c = (2 (6.67384e-11) (.53266 X10^30 kg)) / 299,792,458 =

7.10977523e19/299,792,458 = 2.37156574e11 m

R (nt) = 2.37156574e11 m
R (nt) = 2.37156574e8 km
R (nt) = 237,156,574 km

This is the maximum calculated magnetized volume of space can be occupied at .53266 X10^30 kg (max volume of non-temporal mass). When a star forms, this volume of magnetized space is crushed into the core dynamo of every star. Creating a large enough star from a large enough volume of magnetized space and a neutral horizon in the form of a black hole can be re-established during core collapse. While our star lacks enough mass to re-establish a temporally neutral state of mass, it is a rational starting point for considering a number of exotic magnetized objects in the universe.

This is my first attempt at a rough dimension of how non temporal mass displacement occurs in the form of magnetized volume of space and is probably the cause for error range in a number of constants. While primitive, this is a business major graduate’s first attempt at calculating space time geometry. Magnetized volumes of space are displaced by converting temporal mass into non temporal mass through Singulosynthesis (a deterministic process that should ideally simulated). I am starting to get some numbers for my program. Mass density starting point for Rambo = fairly reasonable to me and is the beginning point for the simulation mentioned in my other paper.

Magnetic volumes of space are compacted during stellar proto star accretion to form the internal dynamo of all stars. However, I suspect a universe model comprising of 73.2135% matter and 26.7865% magnetized space would boil over through Singulosynthesis progressively (this is like stage 4 or 5 on my simulation list). Every star ever formed had to have formed in the presence of existing magnetism, the big bang model does not have this. Forming a star in the big bang model of the universe creates 2 out comes via any model I have seen ranging from, stars blowing themselves apart during ignition before they can reach a hydro static equilibrium or all large stars collapse into an Un-nova. At present, I see a whole bunch of stars and not any Un-nova’s have yet to been observed. The internal magnetic field of all stars cause’s drag on a star’s rotation is not generated completely by core fusion. All stars have the burden of needing enough core mass to crush through existing compacted volumes of magnetized space which exists today in the core of every star. Certain type 1a supernovas offer an opportunity to reveal a non-temporal degeneracy mass around which a star once formed.

Unlike any other form of super nova, a type 1a remnant or event with a known existing companion star will leave behind a non-compacted magnetized volume of space we can indirectly observe. It is the magnetized volume of space around which the star had formed. For the sake of modeling I will use Tycho's remnant as a guide. Since type 1a supernovas occur at the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.44 solar masses my cosmology predicts a minimum of a .3857256 solar mass magnetized volume of space within the remnant, it is what the star formed around. Following the path from the remnants blast shadow created by a companion star, past the companion star will lead you to the vicinity of the progenitor star timeless degeneracy mass region. Lurking within Tycho's remnant 8 - 9.8k light years away will be a compact object with the dimensions of a .3857256 solar mass black non temporal horizon, but it will not "behave" like a black hole. This object will be transparent and may gravitationally lens light in the way galactic scale dark matter does. All type 1a supernova remnants with identified companion stars should have these non-compacted magnetized volumes of space. If the CMBR is the face of God, the gravitational lensing of light caused by these non-compacted magnetized volumes of space objects would be God winking at us.

Some questions that need answering:

Does the current scientific consensus count black holes as matter when they are actually in a temporally neutral state?
If the Bekenstein bound is applicable to black hole horizons could relativistic jets be entropy and physical information overflow mechanisms?
Does the Bekenstein bound manage dark matter production under Singulosynthesis and gravitational wave population or is there another mechanism?
Exactly how sure are we that a stars internal magnetic field is created by fusion in a star core?
How long will our Sun last if it is comprised of a minimum of 26.7865% infusible magnetized timeless degeneracy mass?

© 2013 Jimmy Vick

2) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13467)
Posted 17 Oct 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Based on my worthless ideas, I just posted my rough calculations for the mass density of a black hole singularity... ya....
3) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Mass density of a Black Hole Singularity, first numbers (Message 13466)
Posted 17 Oct 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
The Current Scientific Consensus Composition of the Universe

4.9% - ordinary matter
26.8% - dark matter
68.3% - dark energy

(Note: Totals are from Wikipedia and cross referenced with a few other sources. I am not sure how black holes fit into these totals.)

The Singulosynthesis Universe Current Composition and Beginnings

15.5% - ordinary matter (mass with entropy and physical information)
84.5% - dark matter (Singulosynthesis remnant of timeless degeneracy mass or what I refer to as a "Ted")
0% - dark energy - Is a perceived effect of Singulosynthesis

(Note: These totals may need adjusting due to how black holes are classified by the current scientific consensus; black holes may require their own category.)

Binary black holes must maintain the relativistic binary orbital velocity of the speed of light to perform Singulosynthesis. All physical information and black hole entropy must be reassigned from a lower mass black hole horizon before a larger mass black hole will have no identity conflict (Please refer to my other paper "The path to understanding the rational universe - An argument for the objective observation, recording, and quantification of gravitational waves based on implied consequences of conserving physical information in the entropy of a black hole horizon" if you have no idea what I am referring to or the black hole model I am using). Once the entropy and physical information horizon of a black hole are gone a temporal horizon will remain over the degeneracy mass remnant of the former black hole. A larger mass black hole will accept a timeless degeneracy mass remnant (Dark Matter or Ted) of a former lower mass black hole through its horizon only after Singulosynthesis is complete. This implies a constant ALL dark matter and black holes must abide by. For now it is just known as “The Vick Effect” and should have some relationship to the Hubble’s Law or Hubble’s constant (this is something I am looking into right now).

The primordial dark matter of the Singulosynthesis universe was the timeless degeneracy mass resulting from the first event of Singulosynthesis and it notably had no magnetism. All Singulosynthesis occurring after the first event produced dark matter (timeless degeneracy mass black hole remnants or Ted's) with increasing levels of magnetism. Singulosynthesis produced dark matter to its current levels over time by temporally converting matter into dark matter. The quantity of dark energy we perceive today is the proportion of dark matter produced through Singulosynthesis by converting temporal mass into non temporal mass. Applying the percentage of perceived dark energy 68.3% to the true existing dark matter which is 84.5%, you get a total of 57.7135% of the total currently perceived 84.5% dark matter has actually been produced through Singulosynthesis since the initial event of Singulosynthesis at the beginning of the universe. Dark matter production through Singulosynthesis progressively assisted in the formation of galaxies and the structure of the universe while accelerating the expansion of the universe simultaneously.

The Singulosynthesis universe began with 26.7865% dark matter, 73.2135% matter, and 0% dark energy. This accounts for the 46.427% metallicity discrepancy we observe based on current models. Dark matter is timeless degeneracy mass created through Singulosynthesis at different intervals of time over time. From any black hole's 100% mass, the Singulosynthesis process should always end leaving at minimum a 26.7865% timeless degeneracy mass remnant (dark matter or Ted) of the former black hole. As the universe produces dark matter through Singulosynthesis more entropy and physical information has been assigned to less available mass over time. Entropy and physical information interact with both existing and newly produced gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are particle waves. Entropy and physical information are assigned to mass thereby creating the perception of space and time. The reduction of temporal mass through the assignment of physical information and entropy to gravitational waves also increased the complexity of all gravitational waves in the universe over time. This is why the universe appears to be accelerating and ionized gas has an affinity for magnetized timeless degeneracy mass remnants of former black holes.

The original Singulosynthesis event produced the first gravitational waves (which are really particle waves) of the universe and themselves have been recycled over time. Singulosynthesis recycles duality through reassigning entropy and physical information in the form of reestablished particle waves (which are gravitational waves). This recycling occurred at different times over time creating new particle waves not temporally associated with the original. Just as 46.427% of the universe has been recycled from matter into dark matter, 46.427% of all original particle waves in the universe (which are gravitational waves) have been recycled over time at different times with new time. Regarding the concept of timeless degeneracy mass black hole remnants (Dark matter or Teds) being accepted into horizons of other black holes, this concept can go both ways. Sufficient gravity can crush matter out of time and into an existing temporal horizon creating a black hole horizon with entropy and physical information.

Just to recap, there is no dark energy. Black holes are the tank of the universe in the form of a temporally neutral state of matter, 2 black holes are the engine through recycling time via gravitational waves (which are particle waves), matter is the fuel, byproducts are increasing quantities of dark matter and increasing quantities of entropy and physical information interacting with existing gravitational waves or new ones created through Singulosynthesis. The universe is not dying through ever increasing entropy, it is doing the opposite. The universe is piling more entropy and physical information onto less available mass through gravitational waves. The universe appears to be speeding up in its transition toward a state of pure dark matter and pure entropy and physical information with no mass.

The first generation stars in the universe formed without magnetism and must be generated within a simulation to figure out how they formed without any magnetism. However, I suspect a universe model comprising of 73.2135% matter and 26.7865% timeless degeneracy mass would boil over through Singulosynthesis fairly rapidly (this is like stage 4 or 5 on my simulation list). Every star which formed after the population three stars formed around a magnetized timeless degeneracy mass. The internal magnetic field of all non-first generation stars cause’s drag on a star’s rotation is not generated completely by core fusion. Population 1 and 2 stars have the burdened of needing enough core mass to crush through an existing temporal horizon which exists today in the core of every star. At minimum 26.7865% percent of all population 1 and 2 stars are formed around magnetized non temporal degeneracy mass (dark matter, Teds). Certain type 1a supernovas offer an opportunity to reveal a non-temporal degeneracy mass around which a star once formed.

Based on my ideas all population 1 and 2 stars should form around a magnetized non temporal mass... and that would include our Sun. How can we attempt to calculate what the non-temporal mass quantity within our Sun should be?
Apply perceived percentage of dark energy to the true existing quantity of dark matter:

84.5 x .683 = 57.7135 % is to total dark matter produced through Singulosynthesis

Subtract Singulosynthesis produced non temporal matter (dark matter) from currently perceived non temporal matter (dark matter):

84.5 - 57.7135 = 26.7865 % original dark matter at beginning of Singulosynthesis Universe

The Singulosynthesis Universe Composition Beginnings

26.7865% dark matter (Singulosynthesis will always end with a non-temporal dark matter and this is the best number I have right now)
73.2135% matter
0% dark energy.

Our Suns magnetized core is made up of the final degeneracy non temporal non fusible mass (Temporally neutral state of final degeneracy mass density = black hole singularity (Rambo), non-temporal final degeneracy mass density = Dark Matter (Ted))

1sm x .267865 = .267865 sm non fusible non temporal degeneracy mass: 53266 X10^30 kg

Our Suns has .732135 sm fusible mass: 1.45589 X 10^30 kg

A temporal Gravitational radius is a temporal radius as well:

2GM/c^2 = Rs

(2 (6.67384e-11) (.53266 X10^30 kg)) / 299,792,458^2 = 791.069180m

7.10977523e19 / 299,792,458^2 = 791.069180m

Calculating final degeneracy non temporal mass density at infinite gravity (Temporally neutral state of final degeneracy mass density = black hole singularity (Rambo), non-temporal final degeneracy mass density = Dark Matter (Ted)

Volume of a Sphere= 4/3 Pi R^3

Volume of a Sphere = 4/3 Pi 495043536.1919463m

Volume of a Sphere = Pi 6.60058048e^8 m^3

Volume of a Sphere = 2.07363351e^9 m^3

Density = M/V

D = .53266e^30kg/2.07363351e^9 m^3

D = 2.56872778e^20 kg m^3

You got to start from somewhere... That is my mass density calculation for non-temporal final degeneracy mass (dark matter or as I call a magnetized Ted). It is also the mass density calculation for what is now called the black hole "Singularity" which is actually a temporally neutral state of mass. Regarding space, non-temporal mass abides by some different rules...

When Singulosynthesis occurs at the binary relativistic orbital velocity of the speed of light, entropy and physical information are be reassigned to gravitational waves. Once Singulosynthesis is finished only a temporal horizon remains. If a temporally neutral black hole horizon is governed by 2GM/C^2 law, the horizon of non-temporal matter should be larger because it is at infinite gravity, infinite gravity does not abide by the inverse square law and therefore displaces more space 2GM/C. This is how space is displaced by transferring mass out of time when Singulosynthesis ends.

Calculating a Temporal Horizon area of a non-temporal final degeneracy mass at infinite temporal gravity (dark matter horizon)
(nt) = non temporal

The inverse square law does not apply since it is Non Temporal horizon
2GM/c = R(nt)

2GM/c = (2 (6.67384e-11) (.53266 X10^30 kg)) / 299,792,458 =

7.10977523e19/299,792,458 = 2.37156574e11 m

R (nt) = 2.37156574e11 m
R (nt) = 2.37156574e8 km
R (nt) = 237,156,574 km

Wow that is huge.... There should be a space displacement around our Sun that would be difficult to notice... This is my first attempt at a rough dimension of how non temporal mass displaces space and is probably the cause for error range in a number of constants. While primitive, this is a business major graduate’s first attempt at calculating space time geometry. Space is displaced by converting temporal mass into non temporal mass through Singulosynthesis (a deterministic process that should ideally simulated).... I am starting to get some numbers for my program... Mass density starting point for Rambo = fairly reasonable to me...

Unlike any other form of super nova, a type 1a remnant or event with a known existing companion star will leave behind a magnetized timeless degeneracy mass which we can indirectly observe. It is the magnetized timeless degeneracy mass around which the star formed. For the sake of modeling I will use Tycho's remnant as a guide. Since type 1a supernovas occur at the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.44 solar masses my cosmology predicts a minimum of a .3857256 solar mass magnetized timeless degeneracy mass objected around which the star formed. Following the path from the remnants blast shadow created by a companion star, past the companion star will lead you to the vicinity of the progenitor star timeless degeneracy mass region. Lurking within Tycho's remnant 8 - 9.8k light years away will be a compact object with the dimensions of a .3857256 solar mass black non temporal horizon, but it will not "behave" like a black hole. This object will be transparent and it will gravitationally lens light in the way galactic scale dark matter does. All type 1a supernova remnants with identified companion stars should have these magnetized transparent timeless degeneracy mass objects (magnetized dark matter or Ted's). If the CMBR is the face of God, the gravitational lensing of light caused by these compact timeless degeneracy mass objects would be God winking at us.

1. Mass is synthesized into timeless degeneracy mass (dark matter) at a rate directly related to the accelerated expansion of the universe. It is the perceived effect of dark energy.

2. Gravitational waves are particle waves. Entropy, physical information, and mass will interact with historical gravitational waves or recycled ones.

3. The universe is transitioning to a state of pure dark matter and pure physical information and entropy within gravitational waves over time. This is a final state of pure dark matter and pure light.

4. In a universe where everything is light, time is infinite. The universe is infinite...

Some questions that need answering:

How closely does the Hubble Constant relate to dark matter synthesis through Singulosynthesis?

Singulosynthesis implies increasing entropy and physical information populating of gravitational waves in the universe. Could this growing entropy and physical information discrepancy in the universe be in the form of increased magnetism or other properties?

Is there a maximum quantity of entropy and physical information a gravitational wave (currently known as a particle wave) can handle?

Does the current scientific consensus count black holes as matter when they are actually in a temporally neutral state?

If the Bekenstein bound is applicable to black hole horizons could relativistic jets be entropy and physical information overflow mechanisms?

Does the Bekenstein bound manage dark matter production under Singulosynthesis and gravitational wave population or is there another mechanism?

Exactly how sure are we that a stars internal magnetic field is created by fusion in a star core?

How long will our Sun last if it is comprised of a minimum of 26.7865% infusible magnetized timeless degeneracy mass?

© 2013 Jimmy Vick

4) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Dark Matter in the Singulosynthesis Universe (Message 13445)
Posted 15 Oct 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Narcolepsy I am encountering is getting out of control...

1. Mass is synthesized into timeless degeneracy mass (dark matter) at a rate directly related to the accelerated expansion of the universe. It is the perceived effect of dark energy.

2. Gravitational waves are particle waves. Entropy, physical information, and mass will interact with historical gravitational waves or recycled ones.

3. The universe is transitioning to a state of pure dark matter and pure physical information and entropy within gravitational waves over time. Essentially, a final state of pure dark matter and pure light.

4. In a universe where everything is light, time is infinite. The universe is infinite...
5) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : UKIRT discovers 'impossible' binary stars (Message 13442)
Posted 15 Oct 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Sweet, keep revealing what a fat ugly step sister big bang cosmology is... Cinderella is getting ready for her shot at the glass slipper.
6) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Dark Matter in the Singulosynthesis Universe (Message 13441)
Posted 15 Oct 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
The Current Scientific Consensus Composition of the Universe

4.9% - ordinary matter
26.8% - dark matter
68.3% - dark energy

(Note: Totals are from Wikipedia and cross referenced with a few other sources. I am not sure how black holes fit into these totals.)

The Singulosynthesis Universe Current Composition and Beginnings

15.5% - ordinary matter (mass with entropy and physical information)
84.5% - dark matter (Singulosynthesis remnant of timeless degeneracy mass or what I refer to as a "Ted")
0% - dark energy - Is a perceived effect of Singulosynthesis

(Note: These totals may need adjusting due to how black holes are classified by the current scientific consensus; black holes may require their own category.)

Binary black holes must maintain the relativistic binary orbital velocity of the speed of light to perform Singulosynthesis. All physical information and black hole entropy must be reassigned from a lower mass black hole horizon before a larger mass black hole will have no identity conflict (Please refer to my other paper "The path to understanding the rational universe - An argument for the objective observation, recording, and quantification of gravitational waves based on implied consequences of conserving physical information in the entropy of a black hole horizon" if you have no idea what I am referring to or the black hole model I am using). Once the entropy and physical information horizon of a black hole are gone a temporal horizon will remain over the degeneracy mass remnant of the former black hole. A larger mass black hole will accept a timeless degeneracy mass remnant (Dark Matter or Ted) of a former lower mass black hole through its horizon only after Singulosynthesis is complete. This implies a constant ALL dark matter and black holes must abide by. For now it is just known as “The Vick Effect” and should have some relationship to the Hubble’s Law or Hubble’s constant (this is something I am looking into right now).

The primordial dark matter of the Singulosynthesis universe was the timeless degeneracy mass resulting from the first event of Singulosynthesis and it notably had no magnetism. All Singulosynthesis occurring after the first event produced dark matter (timeless degeneracy mass black hole remnants or Ted's) with increasing levels of magnetism. Singulosynthesis produced dark matter to its current levels over time by temporally converting matter into dark matter. The quantity of dark energy we perceive today is the proportion of dark matter produced through Singulosynthesis by converting temporal mass into non temporal mass. 57.7% of the total currently perceived 84.5% dark matter has actually been produced through Singulosynthesis since the initial event of Singulosynthesis at the beginning of the universe. Dark matter production through Singulosynthesis progressively assisted in the formation of galaxies and the structure of the universe while accelerating the expansion of the universe simultaneously.

The Singulosynthesis universe began with 26.8% dark matter, 78.2% matter, and 0% dark energy. This accounts for the 51.4% metallicity discrepancy we observe based on current models. Dark matter is timeless degeneracy mass created through Singulosynthesis at different intervals of time over time. From any black hole's 100% mass, the Singulosynthesis process should always end leaving at minimum a 26.8% timeless degeneracy mass remnant (dark matter or Ted) of the former black hole. As the universe produces dark matter through Singulosynthesis more entropy and physical information has been assigned to less available mass over time. Entropy and physical information interact with both existing and newly produced gravitational waves. Gravitational waves are particle waves. Entropy and physical information are assigned to mass thereby creating the perception of space and time. The reduction of temporal mass through the assignment of physical information and entropy to gravitational waves also increased the complexity of all gravitational waves in the universe over time. This is why the universe appears to be accelerating and ionized gas has an affinity for magnetized timeless degeneracy mass remnants of former black holes.

The original Singulosynthesis event produced the first gravitational waves (which are really particle waves) of the universe and themselves have been recycled over time. Singulosynthesis recycles duality through reassigning entropy and physical information in the form of reestablished particle waves (which are gravitational waves). This recycling occurred at different times over time creating new particle waves not temporally associated with the original. Just as 51.4 % of the universe has been recycled from matter into dark matter, 51.4 % of all original particle waves in the universe (which are gravitational waves) have been recycled over time at different times with new time. Regarding the concept of timeless degeneracy mass black hole remnants (Dark matter or Teds) being accepted into horizons of other black holes, this concept can go both ways. Sufficient gravity can crush matter out of time and into an existing temporal horizon creating a black hole horizon with entropy and physical information.

Just to recap, there is no dark energy. Black holes are the gas tank of the universe, 2 black holes are the engine through recycling time via gravitational waves (which are particle waves), matter is the fuel, byproducts are increasing quantities of dark matter and increasing quantities of entropy and physical information interacting with existing gravitational waves or new ones created through Singulosynthesis. The universe is not dying through ever increasing entropy, it is doing the opposite. The universe is piling more entropy and physical information onto less available mass through gravitational waves. The universe appears to be speeding up in its transition toward a state of pure dark matter and pure entropy and physical information with no mass.

The first generation stars in the universe formed without magnetism and must be generated within a simulation to figure out how they formed without any magnetism. However, I suspect a universe model comprising of 78.2% matter and 26.8% timeless degeneracy mass would boil over through Singulosynthesis fairly rapidly (this is like stage 4 or 5 on my simulation list). Every star which formed after the first population formed around a magnetized timeless degeneracy mass. The internal magnetic field of all non-first generation stars cause’s drag on a star’s rotation is not generated completely by core fusion. Population 2 stars and on have the burdened of needing enough core mass to crush through an existing temporal horizon which exists today in the core of every star. At minimum 26.8 percent of all non first generation stars are formed around magnetized timeless degeneracy mass (dark matter, Teds). Certain type 1a supernovas offer an opportunity to reveal a timeless degeneracy mass around which a star once formed.

Unlike any other form of super nova, a type 1a remnant or event with a known existing companion star will leave behind a magnetized timeless degeneracy mass which we can indirectly observe. It is the magnetized timeless degeneracy mass around which the star formed. For the sake of modeling I will use Tycho's remnant as a guide. Since type 1a supernovas occur at the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.44 solar masses my cosmology predicts a minimum of a .41 solar mass magnetized timeless degeneracy mass objected around which the star formed. Following the path from the remnants blast shadow created by a companion star, past the companion star will lead you to the vicinity of the progenitor star timeless degeneracy mass region. Lurking within Tycho's remnant 8 - 9.8k light years away will be a compact object with the dimensions of a .41 solar mass black hole, but it will not "behave" like a black hole. This object will be transparent and it will gravitationally lens light in the way galactic scale dark matter does. All type 1a supernova remnants with identified companion stars should have these magnetized transparent timeless degeneracy mass objects (magnetized dark matter or Ted's). If the CMBR is the face of God, the gravitational lensing of light caused by these compact timeless degeneracy mass objects would be God winking at us.

Some questions that need answering:

How closely does the Hubble Constant relate to dark matter synthesis through Singulosynthesis?

Singulosynthesis implies increasing entropy and physical information populating of gravitational waves in the universe. Could this growing entropy and physical information discrepancy in the universe be in the form of increased magnetism or other properties?

Is there a maximum quantity of entropy and physical information a gravitational wave (currently known as a particle wave) can handle?

Does the current scientific consensus count black holes as matter when they are actually in a temporally neutral state?

If the Bekenstein bound is applicable to black hole horizons could relativistic jets be entropy and physical information overflow mechanisms?

Does the Bekenstein bound manage dark matter production under Singulosynthesis and gravitational wave population or is there another mechanism?

Exactly how sure are we that a stars internal magnetic field is created by fusion in a star core?

How long will our Sun last if it is comprised of a minimum of 26.8% infusible magnetized timeless degeneracy mass?

How many answers to how many questions do I currently have under copyright?

Argue with me? Listen to Dolph Lundgren!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c3Y2i-1mD0
7) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13318)
Posted 26 Aug 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
The plot thickens... http://news.sciencemag.org/space/2013/07/swirls-afterglow-big-bang-could-set-stage-major-discovery
8) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13312)
Posted 22 Aug 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Update to my: Binary black hole Koolade manifesto from the fringe....

There comes a time to put down the calculator and figure out what the problem is you are really trying to solve. There is a YouTube video where Professor Kaku applies quantum mechanics to a theoretical black hole made with general relativity and the result is infinity. Kaku then takes general relativity and applies it to quantum mechanics. The result of this is a never ending series of infinity’s.

All that I have put forth so far is a possible path around the illusion of an infinite stalemate.

"The philosophy of science is concerned with all the assumptions, foundations, methods, implications of science, and with the use and merit of science." - Philosophy of Science, Wikipedia

The philosophy of science is divided between scientific realism and instrumentalism. I cautiously lean toward scientific realism. Based on the best current observations and scientific theory my argument is clearly rooted in abductive reasoning. Combining pessimistic induction, Occam's razor, and good old rational persuasion I am arguing for an objective observation that nobody is currently attempting to make.

Two black holes will either coalesce or they will perform synthesis. Until Advanced LIGO or LISA yield some observations as to which position has merit I am focusing on honing my argument, research, studying, arguing my position, preparation to quantify observations, developing a formal strategy, and moving my residence (I HATE MOVING).

I have no illusion that my ideas are anywhere apart from what is considered the scientific “fringe” and that building any consensus at all is going to take a great deal of work. Ironically, I spend half my time arguing with people who don’t believe black holes exist. Every discussion I have had among those who do believe they exist, with the exception of one, has not come even come close to the top tier of Graham's hierarchy of disagreement. I expected to encounter vigorous refutation only to be perplexed by encountering a strange form of collective dismissiveness. This dismissiveness has become in a way reassuring...

The one non dismissive exception I mentioned turned out to be an encouraging exchange indeed. After hashing through various differences in each paradigm’s perspective, a level of acceptance regarding my argument was achieved. What followed was the first and most objective response to my argument yet encountered. It was communicated that there is nothing wrong with having a lofty goal, some excellent advice was given, and I was told that if I pulled it off it would be a guaranteed Nobel Prize. This is not an affirmation I was seeking, it is just the one that was freely given. For me however it was exciting in that someone who is very intelligent has something new to ponder.

The argument I have made does not yet meet the requirements to be thrown under the bus of pseudoscience, junk science, cargo cult science, or any other bus for that matter. If an observation is made that renders my ideas impossible I will abandon them for new ones. There is little solace in being an intellectual bitter clinger. Until then all I can say is “stacking” with an HP 50g in RPN mode is fun.

9) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13292)
Posted 11 Aug 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
I will shorten up the black hole war 2 challenge a little bit, and add some possible goodies based on what I am working on.

The hubris of man has always been consensus based on assumptions and I am right now pointing out a big one.

There is a current scientific consensus that black holes must preserve physical information in their horizons somehow. "Physical information" is referring to quantum determinism and reversibility in the form of the quantum evolution operators via some as yet undiscovered form of quantum gravity.

Even without a formal theory of quantum gravity, there is a huge problem looming even if we did have one. If black holes preserve information in their horizons it would be in a constant state of change. Material is constantly being added to a black hole so the horizon would always be preserving new physical information over time. Meaning all black hole horizons are utterly unique entities based on the black holes mass.

In this case there are 2 possibilities with regard to theoretical black hole coalescence events or merger attempts. Either, we must discover a way to describe quantum gravity then use that theory to mathematically explain how the constantly changing horizons of 2 black holes can scramble unique physical information preserved in their respective horizons. Then mathematically explain how the new black hole somehow sorts this out later after the coalescence event. (Intuition suggests this to be an utterly irrational and seemingly impossible event. Which I refer to as "Black Hole Merger Paradox" or "Black Hole Merger Problem")

OR

Black Holes can never merge. Binary black holes must surrender mass before their unique horizons can interact. This implies a form of synthesis by an unknown process to preserve the unique quantum evolution operators being maintained in each black holes respective horizon. Singulosynthesis: Is a deterministic process by which binary black holes must synthesize each other based on their mass to preserve the physical information in their unique horizons at the expense of time. (my leading suspicion is this occurs at the relativistic velocity of C int he binary black hole system). What might synthesizing black hole synthesize you might ask? Well... what elements on the periodic table have no definitive method for creating them? Big hint here... the first 4.

So hang on just a second... If this implies how the universe began... How can we reconstruct and mathematically describe a process that created the universe? Black hole mergers still occur thankfully, albeit on a less frequent basis. This event is on the very edge of our perception right now. We must observe some unique patterns in gravitational waves (which have not yet been detected), I have four possible patterns in mind right now. They are unique patterns in the sense that nobody has thought of them and therefore nobody is looking for them. Once these unique generic patterns can be located, we can focus our observations at pinning down the true signature of a synthesizing black hole precisely. This will reveal the mass loss rate of a binary black hole Singulosynthesis.

With that information in hand we can then simulate the true sub Planck environment of a black hole, establish a quantum theory of general relativity, amend the second law of thermal dynamics, and figure out a great deal more. Otherwise the universe is inherently irrational.

Unfortunately, Houston has a problem. Right now gravitational interferometers are using exact predetermined theoretic gravitational wave signatures to hunt for patterns in the observed data. Patterns based on the assumption that black holes do indeed coalesce. My idea requires the opposite method to be detected.

The gravitational waves I seek must be observed then quantified. However all may be good... if I am right, black holes will likely be found using the predetermined theoretical match pairing signature method. If they are found, I predict they will deviate from their expected behavior drastically at some point. It will be important to not lose track of them when they do.

While I hate making assumptions... I do tend do collate ideas mentally from greatest to least based on their possibility. My currently most probable scenario has binary black holes sythesizing each other based on their mass once they reach they reach the binary relativistic orbital velocity of C. The mass of the binary black holes in this event will drastically influence the behavior of the event in any theoretical binary black hole situation.

Binary black holes of roughly equal mass will behave normally until they reach a relativistic orbital velocity of C. To prevent further orbital decay both black holes would synthesize mass back in forth to create a binary orbital velocity that may equal C but never exceed C. As the binary black hole systems overall gravitational wave signature diminishes, the new matter being synthesized is inheriting the difference, gravitational waves from the system become the new wave form of matter synthesized at C. This is my benign Singulosynthesis scenario. Get ready for the kicker...

Now consider the extreme scenario... you have a 6 solar mass black hole trying to merge with 1m solar mass black hole in a young galaxy. In this case, to maintain a relativistic orbital velocity at C the 6 solar mass black would have to synthesize mass at C... This could very well be a currently unknown explanation for some gamma ray burst events. If so, the gravitational wave signature will be the waveform of the matter and energy produced by the burst itself. Gamma ray bursts with no afterglow come to mind.

In the "standard model everything" paradigm, part of the hunt for gravitational waves is to see what their correlation with gamma ray bursts might be. In my paradigm, some gamma ray bursts may contain both the gravitational wave form signature within the very particle waves and the duration of black hole failure in the burst itself. Once again, gamma ray bursts with no afterglow come to mind.
10) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13269)
Posted 4 Aug 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Meh all my action is here for now, busy researching and getting ready to move.

http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseudoscience/36138-hello-binary-black-holes-restore-entropy-universe.html#post428109

Argue with me? Listen to Dolph Lundgren!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c3Y2i-1mD0
11) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13264)
Posted 2 Aug 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
The trolls have been fought off and the moderators are relaxing... since I have no discussion going on here, if you want to see one, check out the following on the science forum. Err... their site id down it seems. I am going to post my response here then post it over there later.

Dear vickster339,

Markus Hanke has just replied to a thread you have subscribed to entitled - Hello... Binary Black Holes Restore Entropy to the Universe - in the Pseudoscience forum of The Science Forum.

This thread is located at:
http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseudoscience/36138-hello-binary-black-holes-restore-entropy-universe-new-post.html

Here is the message that has just been posted:
***************

---Quote (Originally by vickster339)---

Solving the BHIP by the approach I have proposed has one advantage over any other. Represent the Singulosynthesis solution to the BHIP as a simple domino, a domino with some unique characteristics. The Singulosynthesis-BHIP domino is larger than any other domino, it is transparent, and yet I can feel the edges of it so I know it is there. When you look beyond where you can feel Singulosynthesis-BHIP domino you notice a line of many other normal black dominoes. The next domino in line is labeled "the second law of thermal dynamics", following that domino is one labeled "the uncertainty principle", following those dominoes is one representing every major cosmological paradox, astronomical problem, incomplete theory, and on down the line. The Singulosynthesis-BHIP domino seems almost impossible to topple but you can clearly see what would be possible if it were to be done. Reason perpetually drives me to unveil this domino fully or extinguish its existence as a possibility. The machine that will run the final simulation will be named Chuck Norris for appropriate reasons.
---End Quote---
Well, you are of course free to try that.
I for my part am not nearly enough of an expert on QFT in curved space-times to decide either way ( my area of expertise is geometrodynamics, not QFT ). It is a highly complicated subject which requires years of intensive study to properly master, and many aspects of it are still pending mathematically rigorous derivations. I do, however, get the main lines of thought behind Hawking's 2004 proposal, and even though I can't follow all of his maths, what he states seems perfectly reasonable to me. Basically it boils down to the fact that there isn't a paradox in the first place, because no information is lost at all. For the minute this is what I personally lean towards, after having studied the original paper to the best of my ability.
***************

There may also be other replies, but you will not receive any more notifications until you visit the forum again.

All the best,
The Science Forum
--------------------------------------------------------------------
My reply:

Assuming the BHIP doesn't exist by math only few can even understand, then black hole horizons would then seem to preserve physical information indeed. You cannot have your cake and eat it too. What exactly is the math behind the horizons of two black holes merging when they are constantly changing? This is the black hole merger paradox. It seems like an impossibly irrational event assumed to occur. Sure one can make a nifty numerical relativistic hydrodynamic simulation of the curved space times swirling together, but that is not where my beef is located. I have thought about horizon mergers for a long time and one day I came to unique realization.

For reasons I have already pointed out, the preservation of evolution operators in the horizon is separated from what is represented in the unknown beyond. In a merger, unique constantly changing evolution operators in horizons must do a pretty astounding "something" and sort it out later on... The dismissiveness I have encountered illustrates the power of the assumptions involved and I am trying to make clear the scale of the real problem.

I have a feeling Mr. Hawking has something new to think about. Or he has already thought about it, ceased wanting to, and hoped nobody else would. For the black hole merger paradox to not exist. It seems reasonable to me that Mr. Hawking or another must now take Hawking's math that few understand and mathematically explain a powerful assumption away.

While the former is being resolved, I will proceed with the only other rational alternative. I will hunting for some unusual gravitational waves that the Standard Model Big Bang Nucleosynthesis model would have a difficult time explaining. The LISA team allowing an individual such as myself to become a collaborator would be extremely helpful.

Destroying black hole horizons solves all problems, no horizon, no problem.

Welcome to Black Hole War 2: The Revenge of the Machinist

Argue with me? Listen to Dolph Lundgren!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c3Y2i-1mD0
12) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13259)
Posted 31 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
If this looks like some sort of manifesto, it is in a way... it began with a thought which lead to the original sarcastic philosophical argument I created. Due to the warm reception of the scientific community I then decided to transform my idea into a more formal argument and have since decided to go all the way with it.

To give you a window into my will as an individual, if observing http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/18/pitch-drop-experiment-single-drip-69-years-video_n_3618195.html from start to finish could lead to a true final answer regarding a black hole merger, I would do it.

Something is occurring in this forum that is not occurring in any other... and I find it to be a curiosity.

Regarding the hits on my own post here, I probably account for 35-40 or so. The remaining hits seem to be people that come back to see what I have to say over time, I have semi tracked the periodicity of the hits. Nobody here is expressing any opinions which I find odd... if my ideas were found to be as intellectually offensive as they have been on other forums, I would think it would be expressed, but it has not been. If people were coming back to see what I had to say and were in agreement, why would that not be expressed? It is the lack of censorship and or discussion encountered in other forums that I find curiously peculiar. To illustrate my point I will present some examples.

1. Astronomy.com forum moderator blocked my argument until I we came to an agreement regarding what I was allowed to discuss in that forum. It has led to this discussion which has since gone silent. http://cs.astronomy.com/asy/general_discussion/f/27/t/57025.aspx

2. http://vixra.freeforums.org/physics-f3.html strangely no replies here as well.

3. http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/black-hole-war-the-revenge-of-the-machinist-62121.html My post was moved from the science forum to the unmoderated forum while simultaneously being attacked by a drone. Once handed h is ass he has not returned.

4. http://www.evcforum.net/Threads.php?control=tf&f=2 outright censored by forum moderators.

5. Cosmoquest.com has been pure drama from the get go. This site is where I tip toed into sharing some of my ideas. It all started with a post called "A call to arms" which was a ham handed attempt to bait another mind into revealing where my argument was weak. Thanks to some aggressive responses I posted a more formal argument. It was immediately censored from the forums. When this censorship occurred I posted my argument immediately on Liveleak.com. Shortly after posting on Liveleak I was confronted in the comments nearly immediately by a very angry individual. One does not need to look hard to find him http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=01e_1370081244 Angry guy and myself go back and forth on liveleak for a few days.

Days later, I returned to my uncensored original post on CosmoQuest days later only to find someone with account access had logged into my account on CosmoQuest and posted selected items from comments on Liveleak using my account. A site admin or moderator from CosmoQuest was impersonating on their forums. These impersonated posts then prompt moderators to punish me accordingly. Using grossly convincing circumstantial evidence I have narrowed down the fraud to one individual and Pamela L. Gay is looking into this fraud.

6. http://www.thescienceforum.com/pseudoscience/36138-hello-binary-black-holes-restore-entropy-universe.html#post428109 After a collection of people from various other forums including my nemesis "Strange" from CosmoQuest performed their beat up the straw man crap... Things have settled down into a more orderly discussion.

Where is the feedback, discussion, and criticism on this forum? So many hits that are not me and nobody has had anything to say? In that case, I invite you to "Come get some! Who wants some?"... I cannot say it any better than Dolph Lundgren http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2c3Y2i-1mD0

If you choose to argue, you will loose...








13) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13239)
Posted 27 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Something that I wanted to make clear and another idea I want to express...

If Advanced Ligo and LISA discover the El Durado of gravitational wave astronomy being the gravitational wave signature of a binary black hole coalescence event then I will be as excited as anyone. My hat would be off to all for that accomplishment and I would get better sleep at night.... honestly.

However, if the black hole merger coalescence signature is not discovered in one, two, or three years from now what then? (the detection probability for advanced LIGO on the low end looks promising at roughly 1 event per month if I recall correctly) The silence would be deafening.

At that point my suggestion would be to attempt a purist approach to gravitational wave astronomy if possible. Rather than using numerical relativity to create a match paring search for an event assumed to exists in the noise of the data... Get the purest data you can from the best observations possible (LISA comes to mind) and try to use numerical relativity to represent the data for what it is and then analyze it.

I will shut up now before I get myself in trouble...
14) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13204)
Posted 14 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Posted the wrong version.... awesome... I have created a condensed version of my argument and included a method to possibly discover the gravitational wave signatures of the process I have proposed... LIGO data is not public until 2018.

The path to understanding the Rational Universe (condensed version)

The universe is a riddle than can ultimately be expressed in the form of math, but first you must solve the riddle. The following is an argument based on rational dissent regarding the implied consequences of conserving physical information (Quantum determinism and Reversibility) in a black hole horizon. A paradox will be made clear and the most rational solution to it currently possible proposed, if the universe is indeed rational (a universe that does not contradict itself). I argue that Dark Energy is no more than a modern day version of Luminiferous Aether and that our universe is a living universe.

If you destroy physical information with black holes using Hawking radiation, then everything I put forth in this argument is inherently irrational. Then again, a universe created from such an entity would also seem equally irrational. Any effort to preserve physical information in the horizon of a black hole via an entropy hologram or other unknown means creates a horrible problem in the event of a black hole merger. Any physical information contained in the horizon of a black hole is in a quasi-state of equilibrium where no two are identical. Black holes are trying to reach a state of equilibrium however material is constantly added. A constant change to the black hole’s horizon containing physical information amounts to a change in black hole identity. Built into a perceivable universe that is rational must be a natural process to keep the horizons containing the constantly changing physical information of two black holes from merging. A rational universe is committed so conserving physical information (see Thought experiment "Black Hole Billiards"). This is true regardless of what form the physical information contained in a black hole horizon may take. Be it an entropy hologram of or some other unknown state. This is the black hole merger paradox. How do you prevent a black hole merger paradox? The “Standard Model” says you don’t, they merge, and just get bigger over time. This is an irrational assumption.

How then are you to prevent the irrational black hole merger event from occurring? The most rational solution is the very gravity, mass, space-time, physical information, and situation creating the problem between two black holes will ultimately solve it. If black holes must abort each other by their very nature because it is rational to do so, you can see exactly where I am going with this. The universe did not begin with a single rational or irrational self-destructing black hole (I am doing the “Standard Model” a favor here, this is one consensus they do not have a consensus on); I argue it was generated in a process by the abortion of 2 or more black holes. Producing everything we see and concealing a process that has been until now out of mankind’s collective perception. Binary black holes will fail based on their mass and conserve physical information at the expense of time. I argue this process still occurs with every attempted black hole merger albeit on a smaller scale over time following the initial event. To describe this new theoretical process I have created 3 simple theoretical place holders that are arguably as real as Dark Energy or ANY other “Standard Model” constant at this point. Yes, I just put every man made constant in history up for grabs. “The Vick Principle”, “The Vick Limit”, “The Vick Field”, and “The Vick Effect” are simply being used to describe something nobody has thought of to my knowledge.

Singulosynthesis: “The Vick Principle” states that in a perceivable and rational universe the physical information of a black hole must be preserved. In a binary black hole merger once sufficient symmetry loss or instability (there is more on ideas behind this in the section “Black Hole Failure Speculation”) is achieved (likely based on black hole mass) the “Vick limit” is reached and simultaneously the “Vick field” is achieved. The Vick limit signals the end of the black hole and the beginning of Singulosynthesis. It is the point at which the binary black holes turn against each other. During Singulosynthesis contents of the former black hole are ejected from the system. Upon ejection, contents escaping inherit new properties from the distorted physical information (Genesis – the dynamic of restoring physical information at the expense of time). This physical information distribution could possibly be in the form of an entropy hologram. The distribution of the physical information of a black hole when it fails is the Vick field. The Vick field is maintained until the black hole of least mass is extinguished. Moreover, both the Vick limit and the Vick fields are constants, once any black hole reaches the "Vick limit" it will fail. On a cosmological scale this process is the compliment of the standard models stellar Nucleosynthesis, meaning Singulosynthesis synthesizes what we now “describe” as H/He/D/Li (by the standard model) of the universe in the quantities and distributions we observe. It is done by preserving physical information in a black hole horizon at the expense of time from our perceived perspective. It is also the process by which the universe recycles matter, energy, physical information, and entropy periodically over time. Singulosynthesis ends with the Vick Effect signaling the return of space time to a non-black hole state.

This is the point at which using standard model methods, graphs, new constants, formulas, and math I describe this event propelling mankind into a new paradigm….. I want us to stop and ponder that idea… Is that rational? You want me to use “standard model” methods that cannot even accurately describe the exterior of a black hole (our reality) to describe the interior of two failing unknown realities? Is that rational? The standard model can only “jump the shark” when it comes to this scenario. The physics of the binary failing black hole scenario presupposes our perceived reality. It is not a mystery now why human kind has not described the physics of a black hole accurately, let alone described the physics that exists outside of a black hole. I argue that Singulosynthesis is the most logical candidate for the deterministic process Einstein always believed existed and you can guess what governs this process.
From this moment forward, there is a path to truth and man will need to set some things aside to get what he wants most. The unknown realm of black hole physics presupposes the one we live in and have built our knowledge on, and is in fact doubling down on the illusion to our perception. How then shall we proceed?

Gravitational Wave Detection

Then Vick Effect may represent the most powerful gravitational wave signature in the universe. The effect would signal the end of a black hole and the return of space time to a non-black hole state potentially creating a powerful gravitational wave signal from which the other currently unknown binary black hole gravitational wave signatures could be found.

If black holes do indeed fail based on a mass relationship, it would imply 2 separate forms of gravitational wave signatures leading up to the Vick Effect. The first would be two binary black holes of equal mass creating a dual gravitational wave signature that would decrease over time as they both performed Singulosynthesis to the point of the Vick Effect. The second would involve a binary black hole scenario where there is a large mass discrepancy between the two black holes. One black hole would potentially gain mass and have an increasing gravitational wave signature while the black hole performing Singulosynthesis would lose mass having a decreasing gravitational wave signature leading up to the Vick Effect. Finding these binary black hole gravity waves is critical to determining the true mass density of a black hole and the rate of material loss due to Singulosynthesis.

Einstein's Deterministic Universe Project

Mankind must simulate binary failing black hole scenarios until they teach us what black hole physics should be and the underlying description completing our understanding of this physical reality.
1. Set aside the “standard model” It should be looked at as dubiously as the Donner Party should have looked at The Emigrants’ Guide had they known what was to come. At least to begin with, it will come into play later.
2. Create a numerical relativistic hydrodynamic simulation in 3 stages
• Simulated black hole failure
• Add theoretical physical information holograms
• Add theoretical magnetism
3. Get some computers – Just as a point of reference, a type 1a supernova simulation took 128k processors 60k hours to make.
4. Run merging simulations until we get something that looks like “standard model” H/He/D/Li and make sure it is reversible.
5. Once we are confident the computer has taught us what our new physics should be. Reproduce the “old standard model Nucleosynthesis” with the newly generated “Singulosynthesis physics” and verify.
7. Simulate the universe until the simulation simulates you…

Thought experiment "Black Hole Billiards"

Man has found a stellar mass black hole and has constructed a double sided mirror in a sphere around it in order to perform an experiment. Nothing is allowed in the black hole and nothing is allowed out. Once the double sided mirror sphere over the black hole is finished man waits a few million years just to be sure the black hole is in some fairly stable state of equilibrium.

During the wait, man has discovered several other black holes moving around our galaxy. FedEx is then hired to accelerate our double sided mirror black hole to as close to the speed of light as possible and collide it into the other black hole with no double sided mirror. The target none double sided mirror black hole will also have a welcoming committee commissioned to bombard it with material constantly as the collision event occurs.

It would seem to me that preserving physical information in the horizon of black hole becomes a difficult task when confronted with the physical information of another black hole. While there are many unknowns, there is a spatial separation between physical information in a black hole horizon and the unknown inner region containing the material that is being represented by the physical information. Is it rational to assume the horizons can somehow scramble information and sort it out later?

In the event this argument goes anywhere I will rename variables accordingly based on their inspiration:

"The Vick Principle" will become the "The Susskind Principle"
"The Vick Limit" will become the "The Hawking Limit"
"The Vick Field" will become "The Titan Field" for my high school or after the name of the team that proves its existence.
“The Vick Effect” will become "The Einstein Effect"
“The Rambo” The state of matter and energy inside a black hole, singularities only exist from our perspective.
"Genesis" will stay "Genesis" for obvious reasons moreover it is the effect produced by the Torpedo from Star Trek 2 the Wrath of Khan.
"The Ted Effect" signals the return of matter, energy, and physical information to space time in a non-black hole state (potentially creating a strange, quark, or neutron star).

https://www.facebook.com/jimmy.vick1
vickster339@gmail.com
© 2013 Jimmy Vick
15) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13203)
Posted 14 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
I have created a condensed version of my argument and included a method to possibly discover the gravitational wave signatures of the process I have proposed... LIGO data is not public until 2018.

The path to understanding the Rational Universe (condensed version)

The universe is a riddle than can ultimately be expressed in the form of math, but first you must solve the riddle. The following is an argument based on rational dissent regarding the implied consequences of conserving physical information (Quantum determinism and Reversibility) in a black hole horizon. A paradox will be made clear and the most rational solution to it currently possible proposed, if the universe is indeed rational (a universe that does not contradict itself). I argue that Dark Energy is no more than a modern day version of Luminiferous Aether and that our universe is a living universe.

If you destroy physical information with black holes using Hawking radiation, then everything I put forth in this argument is inherently irrational. Then again, a universe created from such an entity would also seem equally irrational. Any effort to preserve physical information in the horizon of a black hole via an entropy hologram or other unknown means creates a horrible problem in the event of a black hole merger. Any physical information contained in the horizon of a black hole is in a quasi-state of equilibrium where no two are identical. Black holes are trying to reach a state of equilibrium however material is constantly added. A constant change to the black hole’s horizon containing physical information amounts to a change in black hole identity. Built into a perceivable universe that is rational must be a natural process to keep the horizons containing the constantly changing physical information of two black holes from merging. A rational universe is committed so conserving physical information (see Thought experiment "Black Hole Billiards"). This is true regardless of what form the physical information contained in a black hole horizon may take. Be it an entropy hologram of or some other unknown state. This is the black hole merger paradox. How do you prevent a black hole merger paradox? The “Standard Model” says you don’t, they merge, and just get bigger over time. This is an irrational assumption.

How then are you to prevent the irrational black hole merger event from occurring? The most rational solution is the very gravity, mass, space-time, physical information, and situation creating the problem between two black holes will ultimately solve it. If black holes must abort each other by their very nature because it is rational to do so, you can see exactly where I am going with this. The universe did not begin with a single rational or irrational self-destructing black hole (I am doing the “Standard Model” a favor here, this is one consensus they do not have a consensus on); I argue it was generated in a process by the abortion of 2 or more black holes. Producing everything we see and concealing a process that has been until now out of mankind’s collective perception. Binary black holes will fail based on their mass and conserve physical information at the expense of time. I argue this process still occurs with every attempted black hole merger albeit on a smaller scale over time following the initial event. To describe this new theoretical process I have created 3 simple theoretical place holders that are arguably as real as Dark Energy or ANY other “Standard Model” constant at this point. Yes, I just put every man made constant in history up for grabs. “The Vick Principle”, “The Vick Limit”, and “The Vick Field” are simply being used to describe something nobody has thought of to my knowledge.

Singulosynthesis: “The Vick Principle” states that in a perceivable and rational universe the physical information of a black hole must be preserved. In a binary black hole merger once sufficient symmetry loss or instability (there is more on ideas behind this in the section “Black Hole Failure Speculation”) is achieved (likely based on black hole mass) the “Vick limit” is reached and simultaneously the “Vick field” is achieved. The Vick limit signals the end of the black hole and the beginning of Singulosynthesis. It is the point at which the binary black holes turn against each other. During Singulosynthesis contents of the former black hole are ejected from the system. Upon ejection, contents escaping inherit new properties from the distorted physical information (Genesis – the dynamic of restoring physical information at the expense of time). This physical information distribution could possibly be in the form of an entropy hologram. The distribution of the physical information of a black hole when it fails is the Vick field. The Vick field is maintained until the black hole of least mass is extinguished. Moreover, both the Vick limit and the Vick fields are constants, once any black hole reaches the "Vick limit" it will fail. On a cosmological scale this process is the compliment of the standard models stellar Nucleosynthesis, meaning Singulosynthesis synthesizes what we now “describe” as H/He/D/Li (by the standard model) of the universe in the quantities and distributions we observe. It is done by preserving physical information in a black hole horizon at the expense of time from our perceived perspective. It is also the process by which the universe recycles matter, energy, physical information, and entropy periodically over time.

This is the point at which using standard model methods, graphs, new constants, formulas, and math I describe this event propelling mankind into a new paradigm….. I want us to stop and ponder that idea… Is that rational? You want me to use “standard model” methods that cannot even accurately describe the exterior of a black hole (our reality) to describe the interior of two failing unknown realities? Is that rational? The standard model can only “jump the shark” when it comes to this scenario. The physics of the binary failing black hole scenario presupposes our perceived reality. It is not a mystery now why human kind has not described the physics of a black hole accurately, let alone described the physics that exists outside of a black hole. I argue that Singulosynthesis is the most logical candidate for the deterministic process Einstein always believed existed and you can guess what governs this process.
From this moment forward, there is a path to truth and man will need to set some things aside to get what he wants most. The unknown realm of black hole physics presupposes the one we live in and have built our knowledge on, and is in fact doubling down on the illusion to our perception. How then shall we proceed?

Gravitational Wave Detection

Then Einstein Effect may represent the most powerful gravitational wave signature in the universe. The effect would signal the end of a black hole and the return of space time to a non-black hole state potentially creating a powerful gravitational wave signal from which the other currently unknown binary black hole gravitational wave signatures could be found.

If black holes do indeed fail based on a mass relationship, it would imply 2 separate forms of gravitational wave signatures leading up to the Einstein Effect. The first would be two binary black holes of equal mass creating a dual gravitational wave signature that would decrease over time as they both performed Singulosynthesis to the point of the Einstein Effect. The second would involve a binary black hole scenario where there is a large mass discrepancy between the two black holes. One black hole would potentially gain mass and have an increasing gravitational wave signature while the black hole performing Singulosynthesis would lose mass having a decreasing gravitational wave signature leading up to the Einstein Effect. Finding these binary black hole gravity waves is critical to determining the true mass density of a black hole and the rate of material loss due to Singulosynthesis.

Einstein's Deterministic Universe Project

Mankind must simulate binary failing black hole scenarios until they teach us what black hole physics should be and the underlying description completing our understanding of this physical reality.
1. Set aside the “standard model” It should be looked at as dubiously as the Donner Party should have looked at The Emigrants’ Guide had they known what was to come. At least to begin with, it will come into play later. (LIGO has permission to use the standard model this only applies to my simulation development)
2. Create a numerical relativistic hydrodynamic simulation in 3 stages
• Simulated black hole failure
• Add theoretical physical information holograms
• Add theoretical magnetism
3. Get some computers – Just as a point of reference, a type 1a supernova simulation took 128k processors 60k hours to make.
4. Run merging simulations until we get something that looks like “standard model” H/He/D/Li and make sure it is reversible.
5. Once we are confident the computer has taught us what our new physics should be. Reproduce the “old standard model Nucleosynthesis” with the newly generated “Singulosynthesis physics” and verify.
7. Simulate the universe until the simulation simulates you…

Thought experiment "Black Hole Billiards"

Man has found a stellar mass black hole and has constructed a double sided mirror in a sphere around it in order to perform an experiment. Nothing is allowed in the black hole and nothing is allowed out. Once the double sided mirror sphere over the black hole is finished man waits a few million years just to be sure the black hole is in some fairly stable state of equilibrium.

During the wait, man has discovered several other black holes moving around our galaxy. FedEx is then hired to accelerate our double sided mirror black hole to as close to the speed of light as possible and collide it into the other black hole with no double sided mirror. The target none double sided mirror black hole will also have a welcoming committee commissioned to bombard it with material constantly as the collision event occurs.

It would seem to me that preserving physical information in the horizon of black hole becomes a difficult task when confronted with the physical information of another black hole. While there are many unknowns, there is a spatial separation between physical information in a black hole horizon and the unknown inner region containing the material that is being represented by the physical information. Is it rational to assume the horizons can somehow scramble information and sort it out later?

In the event this argument goes anywhere I will rename variables accordingly based on their inspiration:

"The Vick Principle" will become the "The Susskind Principle"
"The Vick Limit" will become the "The Hawking Limit"
"The Vick Field" may become "The Titan Field" for my high school or after the name of the team that proves its existence.
“The Rambo” The state of matter and energy inside a black hole, singularities only exist from our perspective.
"Genesis" will stay "Genesis" for obvious reasons moreover it is the effect produced by the Torpedo from Star Trek 2 the Wrath of Khan.
"The Einstein Effect" signals the return of space time to non-black hole state.
"The Ted Effect" signals the return of matter, energy, and physical information to space time in a non-black hole state (potentially creating a strange, quark, or neutron star).

https://www.facebook.com/jimmy.vick1
vickster339@gmail.com
© 2013 Jimmy Vick
16) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13193)
Posted 10 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
I have been MR. Nice Guy and playing by the "rules" with elites now for awhile. Between the censorship of my argument, endless bashing of me as an individual, and other morons trying to hijack my work it is time for the gloves to come off. I love mountaineering and I approach my work with a similar attitude. It is called Bring it On.

An intellectual riot will be created by giving away a thought and to the victor go the spoils. I have been shotgunning my stuff to LIGO, other gravitational observatories, and collaborators. If people are smart they will think, if they think they will abandon the futile hunt for standard model dual black hole mergers in the data. Hopefully out of this bunch I can find a Giant to go Giant squashing with.

The universe is a riddle that can ultimately be expressed in the form of math, but first you must solve the riddle. My interest lies in exchanging information that is of a mutually beneficial nature. The clock is ticking and many do not even realize that a race has begun.

While some forms of compact binary systems have been identified using gravitational waves, some of the most sought after remain at large. I can only assume the gravitational signature of a compact binary dual black hole system is the crown jewel. Is it not paradoxical that the binary black hole gravitational wave signature has not yet been found? One would think it would have been found right away according to the standard model. I has been years... If 20 years go by and mankind still has not found a classic binary black hole gravitational wave signature, this is the only other more rational option…

The current hunt involves the search for 2 strong gravitational wave signatures forming a larger one at the point of the merger... this has not been found yet, probably does not exist. As Dr. Jones once said.... http://www.hark.com/clips/ghyyptzpqp-digging-in-the-wrong-place

As I have made clear the classic black hole merger is an irrational event. I think if humans were to parse through existing records with Singulosynthesis in mind we might find dual black hole signatures with the following patterns...

The first pattern would represent two binary black holes of roughly equal mass creating a dual gravitational wave signature that would decrease over time as they both performed Singulosynthesis and lost mass. Which is pretty much the complete opposite of what they have been searching for.

The second would involve a binary black hole scenario where there is a large mass discrepancy between the two black holes. One black hole would potentially gain mass and have an increasing signature while the black hole performing Singulosynthesis would lose mass having a reducing gravitational wave signature.

Here is the big chicken an egg problem... You need to model simulated black hole failure to get an idea of the gravity wave patterns you are looking for, yet you need to find the patterns to create an accurate simulation....

I really think finding the dual decreasing pattern is the ticket... then it could be used as a guide to finding the other, as well as my failure simulation. Since I shotgunned my stuff to every human at LIGO (while unprofessional it is arguably the best spam in human history and potentially reveals the rat fucks that do not think I deserve credit for my work) they took their "contacts" page down from their site... too bad I bookmarked it and blasted them again. The best part is for them to get what they want I get what I want...
17) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13164)
Posted 5 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Too busy blowing up fireworks (blowing up my money, what is more American than that?), to do the math right now... but if my scientifically sacrilegious and idealistic idea has any validity there should be a deterministic gravity wave pattern that the Standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis model would have a very hard time explaining.... I can draw a couple versions of it with a pencil...

LIGO or another gravitational wave interferometer might already have the data... but nobody knows what to look for... Since I am not a "collaborator" and just a cookie crank, it is difficult for me to get the raw data to run a program on... If a theoretical gravity wave pattern could be determined within some reasonable bounds based on Singulosynthesis, It could be looked for... If the pattern is not found in the current data, the next few rounds of data collection will improve the odds substantially.

One of my favorite scenes from any movie... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz4_fb6-_F0
18) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13160)
Posted 4 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
Giga society guy is very clever and I was very drunk... Back to looking at LIGO data.
19) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13129)
Posted 1 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
My idea must be crap.... The Giga Society contacted me.... I have to cook up something respect able now.... I think I am going to hit them with humor... I got stories for days.... Wanna hear one?
20) Forums : Cosmology and Astronomy : Singulosynthesis - Really wish I could take Fred Hoyle out for a beer... (Message 13128)
Posted 1 Jul 2013 by Jimmy Vick
Post:
My idea must be crap.... The Giga Society contacted me.... I have to cook up something respect able now.... I think I am going to hit them with humor... I got stories for days.... Wanna hear one?


Next 20