1) Forums : Technical Support : CAMB 2.09 cpu usage (Message 5080)
Posted 8 Mar 2008 by JAMC
Post:
My home PC (Q6600 @3.2, XP Home) had become very slow and unresponsive today so after anti-virus/ spyware scans I checked Windows Task Manager and saw both SETI cores running at 25% but the COSMO cores were bouncing wildly between 0% and 25% CPU usage. I suspended COSMO and the PC perked right back up again... COSMO suspended on all three quads for me for now...
2) Forums : Technical Support : MD5 check failed ? (Message 5021)
Posted 2 Mar 2008 by JAMC
Post:
and another, different machine... related?

3/2/2008 12:15:03 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 28 seconds of work, reporting 3 completed tasks
3/2/2008 12:15:08 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 1 new tasks
3/2/2008 12:15:10 PM|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_022808_231353_0.ini
3/2/2008 12:15:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|Incomplete read of 2018.000000 < 5KB for params_022808_231353_0.ini - truncating
3/2/2008 12:15:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_022808_231353_0.ini
3/2/2008 12:15:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_022808_231353_0.ini
3) Forums : Technical Support : MD5 check failed ? (Message 4936)
Posted 7 Feb 2008 by JAMC
Post:
Just had another-

2/7/2008 4:04:42 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 2 new tasks
2/7/2008 4:04:44 PM|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_020708_160256_0.ini
2/7/2008 4:04:44 PM|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_020708_160059_1.ini
2/7/2008 4:04:45 PM|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_020708_160256_0.ini
2/7/2008 4:04:45 PM|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_020708_160059_1.ini
2/7/2008 4:04:45 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_020708_160059_1.ini
2/7/2008 4:04:45 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected c7d982f378471ffececa626f743477c3, got 3ca1e1f173cd9ebe411fcfcd848b2d52
2/7/2008 4:04:45 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_020708_160059_1.ini

... same machine as the last one...
4) Forums : Technical Support : MD5 check failed ? (Message 4928)
Posted 6 Feb 2008 by JAMC
Post:
2/5/2008 5:52:06 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 83 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
2/5/2008 5:52:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 1 new tasks
2/5/2008 5:52:13 PM|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_020108_183559_1.ini
2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_020108_183559_1.ini
2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_020108_183559_1.ini
2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 4837863ee4e2068065d67b4849f6cf1e, got 20bda7786fdfdee3d46e9352a27af74f
2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_020108_183559_1.ini

I have seen another one of these in the last couple days but have rebooted all machines since then and don\'t have any details...
5) Forums : Technical Support : MD5 check failed ? (Message 4926)
Posted 6 Feb 2008 by JAMC
Post:
What does this mean?

2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_020108_183559_1.ini
2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 4837863ee4e2068065d67b4849f6cf1e, got 20bda7786fdfdee3d46e9352a27af74f
2/5/2008 5:52:14 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_020108_183559_1.ini

Thanks!
6) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4846)
Posted 27 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
First off, let me assure everybody that I am reading my PMs, but there are so many that it\'s difficult to get through them all quickly.

So it seems I\'ve dug a hole for myself at this point. Since there were something like 50,000 results in progress as the time of the server problems, I had to use a PHP script to grant credits, one that I\'ve used before and seemed to work great the last time. However, the script seems to have faltered due to the extarordinary amount of results in the database and the sheer volume of credit. Some people got too much credit while others received too little and others got none at all.

While I want to make everything right, I realize that each time I manually intervene with credits and such, the situation gets better for a few, but overall, things get a bit worse (it\'s like the 2nd law of thermodynamics, I guess; I can improve things locally, but in the big picture, things steadily get more and more mucked up).

At this point, the \"cleanest\" solution would be to nuke the database and start from scratch, but that\'s a little extreme and you all would probably burn me at the stake. =)

Therefore, everybody who has PMed me at this point will have credit granted to them. After that, however, I will not be manually granting anybody any more credit that they lost during the \"Great Server Fiasco of 2008\". After a while, the credit situation should return to the status quo and we all can put this behind us.

Please post if you have any questions or concerns.

EDIT: Also, when I grant you credit, I will PM you to let you know.


Fair enough Scott, that\'s good enough for me
... I realize you have been swamped and under a certain amount of pressure to make it all right again so thanks for your effort.
All I want is \'Status Quo Ante Bellum\' ;)... restoration of my pre-snafu Pending Credit cache> no bonus credit requested or expected... good luck
7) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4807)
Posted 26 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
... given the \'generous\' nature of the bonus credits given others as a result of this event...


I haven\'t seen any evidence of the \'generous\' bonus credits being handed to anyone. Looking at my own Task List page I see:

- Tasks that are marked \"Didn\'t need\" indicating a Server initiated abort have Granted credit of 100 in the Task record but not fed through to my Task list page or my totals.

- Tasks that are marked \"Client detached\" indicating a Client initiated abort have Granted credit of 100 in the Task record but not fed through to my Task list page or my totals.

I have looked at a number of different hosts today and none had a jump of 10000 credits yesterday as I would expect if this had all happened as has been described. So, did anyone see any of these unearned credits? If not, then we still have a (relatively) level playing field.

Oh - and one other thing - I have just counted up the number of \"Completed\" WU\'s on my Tasks screens = 76; my account is showing Total Credit of only 7000 so the credit for 6 WU\'s seems to have gone missing between the 2 screens. Is is a coincidence that there were probably 6 WU\'s that were only \"Pending\" when the credit was granted; could it be the lack of full validation that is causing them not to register on my account total??

Sorry for the long post but I am trying to understand what has really happened here as opposed to what was intended.

F.


Well, check this:
http://www.cosmologyathome.org/forum_thread.php?id=366

Don\'t get me wrong here folks, I\'m just trying to break even after all is said and done- just not end up -10,000 credits and be jumped on for it...
:), :), :)!!! (smiley face- smiley face- smiley face)

Edit: In fact if it will help my case I can fax someone my \'pending credit\' printout from yesterday morning- if I can dig it out of the garbage can at work tomorrow morning...
8) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4804)
Posted 26 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
I\'m confused... I have WU\'s listed as \"client detached\" and \"didn\'t need\" with zero credits granted... do these WU\'s get \'bonus\' credit or are they discarded for good?
\'client detached\' I assume was a result of trying to reattach to the new URL\'s (some confusion on my part as to which was the \'right\' one to change to)...
what is \'didn\'t need\'??
Thanks!


Since the credit was applied outside of the validator by a script it shows up nowhere except in the totals ...if you notice your rac hasn\'t changed either.There is no bonus...credit granted was for everything in the work queues and in pending of each user.There was a problem when the script was run but impossible to really fix because all the old work has been deleted from the database.


Well, bottom line I lost my \'pending credit\' of ~100 WU\'s that was sitting there prior to the snafu... my COSMO totals have changed little in the last day or so as seen in my account or the web stats totals... OUCH!
Oh well, this is in Beta :)
As I stated earlier in this thread please PM Scott if that OUCH! hurts that much.


I did... yesterday...
I printed my pending credit yesterday and there was 100+ WU\'s there or 10,000 credits so yes that does hurt given the \'generous\' nature of the bonus credits given others as a result of this event... not that credits matter !!! :)
9) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4802)
Posted 25 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
I\'m confused... I have WU\'s listed as \"client detached\" and \"didn\'t need\" with zero credits granted... do these WU\'s get \'bonus\' credit or are they discarded for good?
\'client detached\' I assume was a result of trying to reattach to the new URL\'s (some confusion on my part as to which was the \'right\' one to change to)...
what is \'didn\'t need\'??
Thanks!


Since the credit was applied outside of the validator by a script it shows up nowhere except in the totals ...if you notice your rac hasn\'t changed either.There is no bonus...credit granted was for everything in the work queues and in pending of each user.There was a problem when the script was run but impossible to really fix because all the old work has been deleted from the database.


Well, bottom line I lost my \'pending credit\' of ~100 WU\'s that was sitting there prior to the snafu... my COSMO totals have changed little in the last day or so as seen in my account or the web stats totals... OUCH!
Oh well, this is in Beta :)
10) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4798)
Posted 25 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
I\'m confused... I have WU\'s listed as \"client detached\" and \"didn\'t need\" with zero credits granted... do these WU\'s get \'bonus\' credit or are they discarded for good?
\'client detached\' I assume was a result of trying to reattach to the new URL\'s (some confusion on my part as to which was the \'right\' one to change to)...
what is \'didn\'t need\'??
Thanks!
11) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4738)
Posted 25 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
So I had ~100 WU\'s (4,842.89)in \'Pending\' this am before the snafu and they all vanished but my total credit has not increased- should the adjustment to the total credit have occurred by now?
Thanks!
12) Forums : Technical Support : Upload/Download Server Problems (Message 4703)
Posted 24 Jan 2008 by JAMC
Post:
I had 4,842.89 in Pending Credits earlier today and now it reads \'0\' ?!


Also:
1/24/2008 2:01:13 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: Project initialization. Requesting 1 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
1/24/2008 2:01:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
1/24/2008 2:01:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: Server can\'t open database
1/24/2008 2:01:38 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 172004 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
1/24/2008 2:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
1/24/2008 2:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: Server can\'t open database
1/24/2008 2:03:28 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 171995 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
1/24/2008 2:03:33 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
1/24/2008 2:03:33 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: Server can\'t open database
1/24/2008 2:04:03 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 171996 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
1/24/2008 2:04:08 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks
1/24/2008 2:04:08 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: Server can\'t open database
1/24/2008 2:52:31 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 172050 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
1/24/2008 2:52:36 PM|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks

... this was after detaching and reattaching to-
http://cosmologyathome.org/