Forums :
Technical Support :
No work for platform
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 mgpower0Send message Joined: 4 Nov 07 Posts: 10 Credit: 587,780 RAC: 0 |
Has this turned into a windows only project. 48600 wu\'s ready to send and not 1 is apparently for Linux.Seems I am done with this project |
|
UBT - JohnR Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Jun 07 Posts: 7 Credit: 1,170,115 RAC: 0 |
No work for my Windoze machine either, I don\'t trust the Server Status page fully. Are you trying both Linux running on an \"AMD x86_64 or Intel EM64T CPU\" and \"Linux running on an Intel x86-compatible CPU\" as work may be created separately. |
|
Roland_f Send message Joined: 21 Mar 08 Posts: 10 Credit: 281,620 RAC: 0 |
No work for my Windoze machine either, I don\'t trust the Server Status page fully. I also don\'t get any new WU downloaded the whole morning - and I have really the most common Intel platforms and Win-XP-32bit and Win-XP-64bit . So obviously not AMD vs Intel or XP vs. Vista vs. Linux etc.. related but the problem is obviously with the C@H server after the floodgates were re-opened and thousand of crunched WU are uploaded again. |
|
Brian Silvers Send message Joined: 11 Dec 07 Posts: 420 Credit: 270,580 RAC: 0 |
No work for my Windoze machine either, I don\'t trust the Server Status page fully. Requests by my AMD/Windows machine get \"no work from project\", which means that there was nothing for the feeder to send, no matter what the platform. The status page is essentially worthless, from what I\'ve been able to tell... 2 days of only uploads for the database to \"settle down\"? I\'m having trouble believing that. Even if I do believe it, then, IMO, this indicates a severe problem with something...as even the much more strained SETI servers have been able to recover quicker from far more severe problems... Perhaps I should\'ve not asked people to give balanced feedback, considering the project is showing their inability to do the same... |
|
Nothing But Idle Time Send message Joined: 27 Aug 07 Posts: 84 Credit: 148,380 RAC: 0 |
Just perhaps there is work but the daemons aren\'t communicating that fact and nothing is being sent out as a result....maybe. |
|
WimTea Send message Joined: 16 Nov 07 Posts: 27 Credit: 408,380 RAC: 0 |
I think work is allowed to report, but no new work is sent yet. Doesn\'t show on the server status page though. |
|
[PST]Howard Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 8 Jun 07 Posts: 4 Credit: 302,014 RAC: 0 |
From front page: April 2, 2008 Letting the validator catch up Due to the flux in workunits that has been taking place recently, there\'s quite a lot of strain on the database. So, until the validator and the other daemons are caught up on their work, we aren\'t going to send out any more WUs. We\'ll restart the scheduler as soon as it\'s done. Thank you for your patience. They resatrted project daemons yesterday but it may take a while for everyone to see work coming through. 
|
|
Scott Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer  Send message Joined: 1 Apr 07 Posts: 662 Credit: 13,742 RAC: 0 |
I\'ve taken a look at the distribution of workunits across HR classes and the biggest pieces are as follows: Windows Core 2 Duo: 22653 Unassociated: 20354 Windows Xeon: 4906 Windows Athlon 64: 3595 Linux Core 2 Duo: 3316 Linux Xeon: 3153 The rest are under 2000. Since so many are unassociated, I assume that the server problems were the cause of the \"no work\" messages. I think I may have finally solved them (although I should remain cautious about saying that), and I\'ve increased the number of available WUs, so you should be able to get work soon, if not now. Scott Kruger Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home |
|
Brian Silvers Send message Joined: 11 Dec 07 Posts: 420 Credit: 270,580 RAC: 0 |
I\'ve taken a look at the distribution of workunits across HR classes and the biggest pieces are as follows: Windows Athlon 64 host is now back to: 4/5/2008 3:03:23 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: (there was work but it was committed to other platforms) 
|
|
Honza Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 May 07 Posts: 26 Credit: 5,222,146 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for stopping by, Scott. I run couple of Core 2 Quads hosts on Windows (Win XP, 2003 x64 and 2008 x64) and I get: Cosmology@Home 5.4.2008 21:04:06 Message from server: (there was work but it was committed to other platforms) Cosmology@Home 5.4.2008 21:04:06 Message from server: No work sent Is C2Q considered different from C2D? I assume yes - in BOINC perspective - even those are actualy twins of C2D. BOINC Project specifications and hardware requirements |
|
Fred Send message Joined: 17 Jan 08 Posts: 40 Credit: 228,230 RAC: 0 |
I\'ve taken a look at the distribution of workunits across HR classes and the biggest pieces are as follows: So is my Q6600 F. 
|
|
Scott Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Send message Joined: 1 Apr 07 Posts: 662 Credit: 13,742 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for stopping by, Scott. All Intel \"Core\" processors fall under the C2D label, since they\'re basically all the same architecture. So you\'re saying that both your 32-bit and 64-bit machines aren\'t getting work? Scott Kruger Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home |
|
Brian Silvers Send message Joined: 11 Dec 07 Posts: 420 Credit: 270,580 RAC: 0 |
I\'ve taken a look at the distribution of workunits across HR classes and the biggest pieces are as follows: My AMD got a partial fill of what it requested just now, then it went back to saying work was committed to other platforms... I think the problem will just be transient while hungry systems go through their \"refill cache\" phase, then it should go back to some sense of normalcy...
|
|
Honza Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 May 07 Posts: 26 Credit: 5,222,146 RAC: 0 |
All Intel \"Core\" processors fall under the C2D label, since they\'re basically all the same architecture. It\'s coming in slowly - it takes several attemps to download just single or couple of WUs but it\'s comming now. Like 5 attemps gives 1 WUs. I can see checksum or signature errors from time to time as well. BOINC Project specifications and hardware requirements |
|
Fred Send message Joined: 17 Jan 08 Posts: 40 Credit: 228,230 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for stopping by, Scott. Aha! Things seemed to start coming through about 20:00 UTC. However, I also seem to be getting regular \"Check sum errors\": 05/04/2008 20:25:04|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 426814 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 05/04/2008 20:25:09|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks 05/04/2008 20:25:09|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: No work sent 05/04/2008 20:25:09|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: (there was work but it was committed to other platforms) . . other projects . 05/04/2008 21:04:08|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 426942 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 05/04/2008 21:04:13|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 9 new tasks 05/04/2008 21:04:15|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_162328_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:15|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_162343_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:16|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_162328_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:16|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_162343_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:16|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_162345_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:16|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_163908_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:18|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_162345_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:18|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_163908_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:18|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_163917_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:18|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_163921_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:19|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_163917_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:19|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_163921_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:19|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_163926_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:19|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_164214_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:20|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_163926_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:20|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_164214_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:20|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_164247_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:22|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_164247_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:23|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 367133 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 05/04/2008 21:04:28|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 4 new tasks 05/04/2008 21:04:31|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_222839_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:31|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_222843_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:32|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_222839_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:32|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_222843_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:32|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_223009_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:32|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_032808_223010_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:33|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_223009_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:33|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_032808_223010_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:33|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_032808_223009_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:04:33|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 8ec76813069e5fdf4db723a18a6e99a7, got 3e625643ec5daa897cb541d3e3941f85 05/04/2008 21:04:33|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_032808_223009_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:35|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 367133 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks 05/04/2008 21:05:45|Cosmology@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 9 new tasks 05/04/2008 21:05:47|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_135156_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:47|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_123911_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_135156_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_123911_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_144009_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_132607_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_033008_123911_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 057fe4bdae069694a34210d265eae3c2, got d97bcf8434b7b8cf515793c1f9713c9b 05/04/2008 21:05:48|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_033008_123911_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_144009_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_132607_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_144009_2.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_144013_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_033008_144009_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected df84a6272afeac401115dbd3f4026525, got da2126cb346b760f845eab0b45edd2f2 05/04/2008 21:05:50|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_033008_144009_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:51|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_144009_2.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:51|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_144013_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:51|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_144014_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:51|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_144014_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:52|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_144014_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:52|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_144014_1.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:52|Cosmology@Home|Started download of params_033008_144004_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:52|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_033008_144014_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:52|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 8c0c239edde002179f65674e0aa973f2, got 39f0c20f22391eb9dbddbf21dcd4a67a 05/04/2008 21:05:52|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_033008_144014_0.ini 05/04/2008 21:05:54|Cosmology@Home|Finished download of params_033008_144004_0.ini Not in panic mode in any way, but I thought the above dump might be useful. F.
|
|
Adamo Send message Joined: 21 Mar 08 Posts: 5 Credit: 90,840 RAC: 0 |
when do you plan to release \"alpha\" C@h? I mean, when do you plan to do this and think the project will be more-less ready to change its state? I`m just curious.. :D |
Conan Send message Joined: 28 Aug 07 Posts: 169 Credit: 1,256,874 RAC: 0 |
when do you plan to release \"alpha\" C@h? I mean, when do you plan to do this and think the project will be more-less ready to change its state? I`m just curious.. :D G\'Day Adamo, As I understand it, Alpha comes before Beta, therefore as Cosmology@home has now been Beta for awhile, then it has already been through Alpha. With the current problems some people might say it is running like an Alpha project but that is just the way they perceive it. Beta projects also have problems, even ones running full steam and out of Beta (look at Seti and tell me it does not crash every now and then). So you missed the Alpha stage as you are in the Beta stage. The next stage is a full blown project but that requires more resources than are available at the moment (they are working on it). |
|
OrangeMediumGreen Send message Joined: 7 Apr 08 Posts: 1 Credit: 16,930 RAC: 0 |
I\'m not getting any work too. The only feedback I\'m getting is this: Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 11717 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks. Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks. I\'m running boinc 5.10.44 on a 64Bit Linux. |
|
xPOD Send message Joined: 26 Mar 08 Posts: 21 Credit: 267,948,396 RAC: 27,778 
|
4/9/2008 4:49:35 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: No work sent 4/9/2008 4:49:35 PM|Cosmology@Home|Message from server: (there was work but it was committed to other platforms) :( 
|
the silver surfer Send message Joined: 11 Jan 08 Posts: 9 Credit: 48,970 RAC: 0 |
I`m getting \" no work from project \", although the server status page shows: Results ready to send 84,212. Tried several times today, same message.  |
