Advanced search

Forums : Technical Support : New Work Units
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 152 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 16:58:24 UTC

The new work units are still not showing progress. I don't know if the problem was to be fixed with these new WU's.
ID: 152 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Scott
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 07
Posts: 662
Credit: 13,742
RAC: 0
Message 153 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 17:26:07 UTC - in response to Message 152.  

The new work units are still not showing progress. I don't know if the problem was to be fixed with these new WU's.

It wasn't. When a new application version is released, that's when the progress issue will be fixed.
Scott Kruger
Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home
ID: 153 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Bok
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 11
Credit: 1,938,871
RAC: 0
Message 155 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57:30 UTC

I'm seeing progress on the wu's I've received on both linux and windows...

CAMB 1.11 on windows and CAMB 1.12 on linux both with BOINC 5.8

ID: 155 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 156 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 18:00:01 UTC - in response to Message 153.  

The new work units are still not showing progress. I don't know if the problem was to be fixed with these new WU's.

It wasn't. When a new application version is released, that's when the progress issue will be fixed.



OK roger that :-)
The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
ID: 156 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 157 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 18:00:35 UTC - in response to Message 155.  
Last modified: 12 Jun 2007, 18:00:52 UTC

I'm seeing progress on the wu's I've received on both linux and windows...

CAMB 1.11 on windows and CAMB 1.12 on linux both with BOINC 5.8




Well! Arn't we special :-) - Lucky dog you :-)
The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
ID: 157 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Bok
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 11
Credit: 1,938,871
RAC: 0
Message 160 - Posted: 12 Jun 2007, 20:00:50 UTC

actually I'm wrong.. my bad. oops.

I read this wrongly and was looking at the wrong field...
ID: 160 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Gamma^Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 47
Credit: 70,587
RAC: 0
Message 167 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 5:37:51 UTC

Mine shows progress ! It shows 100% Done when its finished LoL ....

Seriously though, No CURRENT progress is shown on mine either as of now. And it shows a average To Completion time of 16:21 minutes per work unit for now also. :)

G^R
Windows-XP-Pro, AMD 3800X2, 5.10.28
ID: 167 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [BAT] tutta55
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 217
Credit: 710,406
RAC: 0
Message 169 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 7:51:02 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jun 2007, 7:51:16 UTC

Are these new work units variable in length? I downloaded 2 at the same time: WU 68125 ran for 2200 seconds, and 68126 ran for 3600 seconds.

BOINC.BE: For Belgians who love the smell of glowing red cpu's in the morning
Tutta55's Lair
ID: 169 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Gamma^Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 47
Credit: 70,587
RAC: 0
Message 171 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 11:57:33 UTC

I would say so, As I also have some that run anywhere from 460 seconds up to 1000+ seconds. ALthough most seem to be in or around the mid 850's to 1000+ cpu second range for me.
Windows-XP-Pro, AMD 3800X2, 5.10.28
ID: 171 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Gamma^Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 47
Credit: 70,587
RAC: 0
Message 172 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 12:32:26 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jun 2007, 12:34:02 UTC

I did just run into this error when trying to download new work :

wu = 75361

6/13/2007 7:27:42 AM|Cosmology@Home|[file_xfer] Started download of file params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[file_xfer] Finished download of file params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[file_xfer] Throughput 30210 bytes/sec
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 8b28fa2230f3685e9847190a9b5fdd2d, got 6fc73e7843a90d0eb3af46d55c6ba7a4
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:44 AM|Cosmology@Home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
6/13/2007 7:27:44 AM|Cosmology@Home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result wu_061207_175007_0_7 (WU download error: couldn't get input files:<file_xfer_error> <file_name>params_061207_175007_0.ini</file_name> <error_code>-119</error_code> <error_message>MD5 check failed</error_message></file_xfer_error>)


As of now just getting no work from project.

G^R

Windows-XP-Pro, AMD 3800X2, 5.10.28
ID: 172 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 174 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 13:11:03 UTC - in response to Message 172.  

I did just run into this error when trying to download new work :

wu = 75361

6/13/2007 7:27:42 AM|Cosmology@Home|[file_xfer] Started download of file params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[file_xfer] Finished download of file params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[file_xfer] Throughput 30210 bytes/sec
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[error] MD5 check failed for params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[error] expected 8b28fa2230f3685e9847190a9b5fdd2d, got 6fc73e7843a90d0eb3af46d55c6ba7a4
6/13/2007 7:27:43 AM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Checksum or signature error for params_061207_175007_0.ini
6/13/2007 7:27:44 AM|Cosmology@Home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
6/13/2007 7:27:44 AM|Cosmology@Home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result wu_061207_175007_0_7 (WU download error: couldn't get input files:<file_xfer_error> <file_name>params_061207_175007_0.ini</file_name> <error_code>-119</error_code> <error_message>MD5 check failed</error_message></file_xfer_error>)


As of now just getting no work from project.

G^R



I had the same thing happen with wu 71018, all others processed ok after that one.

The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
ID: 174 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Gamma^Ray
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Jun 07
Posts: 47
Credit: 70,587
RAC: 0
Message 177 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 13:49:34 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jun 2007, 13:49:56 UTC

Hmm, Not sure. The server shows no work units available to send, So maybe its one of those times where my client tried to get more work, Just as it ran out and so then gives that error ? Just a guess. ;)

G^R
Windows-XP-Pro, AMD 3800X2, 5.10.28
ID: 177 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Marky-UK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 9
Credit: 18,440
RAC: 0
Message 178 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 18:12:12 UTC

Most of the current WUs are failing on Linux boxes after about 10 seconds with "Maximum CPU time exceeded". They seem to be working OK on Windows boxes.
ID: 178 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 179 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 18:19:25 UTC - in response to Message 178.  

Most of the current WUs are failing on Linux boxes after about 10 seconds with "Maximum CPU time exceeded". They seem to be working OK on Windows boxes.



Also failing in Windows at or around 10 seconds

13/06/2007 2:16:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Aborting task wu_061307_125826_0_0: exceeded CPU time limit 7.714173
13/06/2007 2:16:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
13/06/2007 2:16:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result wu_061307_125826_0_0 (Maximum CPU time exceeded)
13/06/2007 2:16:25 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_0
13/06/2007 2:16:31 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_1
13/06/2007 2:16:36 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_2
13/06/2007 2:16:42 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_3
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_4
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|Computation for task wu_061307_125826_0_0 finished
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_0 for task wu_061307_125826_0_0 absent
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_1 for task wu_061307_125826_0_0 absent
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_2 for task wu_061307_125826_0_0 absent
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_3 for task wu_061307_125826_0_0 absent
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_125826_0_0_4 for task wu_061307_125826_0_0 absent
13/06/2007 2:16:47 PM|SETI@home|Restarting task 28fe05aa.13914.26130.248564.3.175_1 using setiathome_enhanced version 517
13/06/2007 2:17:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks
13/06/2007 2:17:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Requesting 786091 seconds of new work, and reporting 1 completed tasks

The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
ID: 179 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 180 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 18:24:28 UTC

Work Units are aborting, and getting computation errors – I’m setting project to NO NEW TASKS for now.
The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
ID: 180 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Marky-UK
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 9
Credit: 18,440
RAC: 0
Message 183 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 19:02:05 UTC

Yeah, they're failing on my Windows boxes too now. It looks like I still had some older one on there before. The wu_061307_09* ones seem to run and the _12* ones are all failing.
ID: 183 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [B^S] Acmefrog
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 175
Credit: 446,074
RAC: 0
Message 184 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 19:41:51 UTC - in response to Message 183.  

Yeah, they're failing on my Windows boxes too now. It looks like I still had some older one on there before. The wu_061307_09* ones seem to run and the _12* ones are all failing.


Ditto here on my Windows as well.
ID: 184 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Barbud [USA]
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 254,270
RAC: 0
Message 186 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 20:09:02 UTC

Well, I can say that it doesn't have anything to do with the older WU's since I just got the code and signed up and within 5 minutes I had a result download, fail, upload and another download, fail before I could suspend the project. The errors are the same:

6/13/2007 2:59:40 PM|Cosmology@Home|Starting wu_061307_143526_0_0
6/13/2007 2:59:40 PM|Cosmology@Home|Starting task wu_061307_143526_0_0 using camb version 111
6/13/2007 2:59:48 PM|Cosmology@Home|Aborting task wu_061307_143526_0_0: exceeded CPU time limit 5.324034
6/13/2007 2:59:48 PM|Cosmology@Home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
6/13/2007 2:59:48 PM|Cosmology@Home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result wu_061307_143526_0_0 (Maximum CPU time exceeded)
6/13/2007 2:59:56 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_0
6/13/2007 3:00:02 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_1
6/13/2007 3:00:07 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_2
6/13/2007 3:00:12 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_3
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_4
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Computation for task wu_061307_143526_0_0 finished
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_0 for task wu_061307_143526_0_0 absent
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_1 for task wu_061307_143526_0_0 absent
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_2 for task wu_061307_143526_0_0 absent
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_3 for task wu_061307_143526_0_0 absent
6/13/2007 3:00:18 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143526_0_0_4 for task wu_061307_143526_0_0 absent
6/13/2007 3:01:04 PM|Cosmology@Home|Starting wu_061307_143543_0_1
6/13/2007 3:01:04 PM|Cosmology@Home|Starting task wu_061307_143543_0_1 using camb version 111
6/13/2007 3:01:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|Aborting task wu_061307_143543_0_1: exceeded CPU time limit 5.324034
6/13/2007 3:01:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
6/13/2007 3:01:11 PM|Cosmology@Home|Reason: Unrecoverable error for result wu_061307_143543_0_1 (Maximum CPU time exceeded)
6/13/2007 3:01:19 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_0
6/13/2007 3:01:24 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_1
6/13/2007 3:01:31 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_2
6/13/2007 3:01:37 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_3
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|[error] Can't rename output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_4
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Computation for task wu_061307_143543_0_1 finished
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_0 for task wu_061307_143543_0_1 absent
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_1 for task wu_061307_143543_0_1 absent
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_2 for task wu_061307_143543_0_1 absent
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_3 for task wu_061307_143543_0_1 absent
6/13/2007 3:01:43 PM|Cosmology@Home|Output file wu_061307_143543_0_1_4 for task wu_061307_143543_0_1 absent

Hopefully we will have cure soon.
ID: 186 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Scott
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 07
Posts: 662
Credit: 13,742
RAC: 0
Message 187 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 20:16:07 UTC

I've been watching this issue and I'm working right now to resolve it. It looks to be a problem with the new WU template I made earlier today. I should have it fixed soon.
Scott Kruger
Project Administrator, Cosmology@Home
ID: 187 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BORG
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 17
Credit: 35,611
RAC: 0
Message 189 - Posted: 13 Jun 2007, 20:30:36 UTC - in response to Message 187.  

I've been watching this issue and I'm working right now to resolve it. It looks to be a problem with the new WU template I made earlier today. I should have it fixed soon.



Seems to be working OK again.


The universe is not required to be in perfect harmony with human ambition.
ID: 189 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Forums : Technical Support : New Work Units